These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3597894)

  • 1. MR imaging of large nonferromagnetic metallic implants at 1.5 T.
    Augustiny N; von Schulthess GK; Meier D; Bösiger P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 3597894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact.
    Shellock FG; Mink JH; Curtin S; Friedman MJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 1562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants.
    Laakman RW; Kaufman B; Han JS; Nelson AD; Clampitt M; O'Block AM; Haaga JR; Alfidi RJ
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):711-4. PubMed ID: 4059558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Susceptibility Artifacts Related to Metallic Implants on Adjacent-Lesion Assessment in Simultaneous TOF PET/MR.
    Svirydenka H; Delso G; De Galiza Barbosa F; Huellner M; Davison H; Fanti S; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EEGW
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28062597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.
    Rudisch A; Kremser C; Peer S; Kathrein A; Judmaier W; Daniaux H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 9549791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):811-4. PubMed ID: 3048071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging of 22 Charnley-Müller total hip prostheses.
    Lemmens JA; van Horn JR; den Boer J; van der Riet W; Ruijs JH
    Rofo; 1986 Sep; 145(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 3020635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.
    Graf H; Lauer UA; Berger A; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15862651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.
    Leclet H
    Eur Spine J; 1994; 3(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 7866844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Talbot BS; Weinberg EP
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
    New PF; Rosen BR; Brady TJ; Buonanno FS; Kistler JP; Burt CT; Hinshaw WS; Newhouse JH; Pohost GM; Taveras JM
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 6828719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on metallic middle ear prostheses.
    Mattucci KF; Setzen M; Hyman R; Chaturvedi G
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Apr; 94(4):441-3. PubMed ID: 3086805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants.
    Bagheri MH; Hosseini MM; Emami MJ; Foroughi AA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 21146947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D-CT evaluation of metallic implants: principles, techniques, and applications.
    Neyman EG; Corl FS; Fishman EK
    Crit Rev Comput Tomogr; 2002; 43(6):419-52. PubMed ID: 12521150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application and advantages of monoenergetic reconstruction images for the reduction of metallic artifacts using dual-energy CT in knee and hip prostheses.
    Magarelli N; De Santis V; Marziali G; Menghi A; Burrofato A; Pedone L; Del Prete D; Iezzi R; de Waure C; D'andrea M; Leone A; Colosimo C
    Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):593-600. PubMed ID: 29637389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.