These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3597894)

  • 21. [Inherent problems of the use of magnetic resonance in patients with metallic implants currently used in orthopedic practice].
    Gigli F; Fontana M; Brusori S; Capanna R; Smargiassi E; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 May; 83(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 1631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8180463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants.
    Ramos-Cabrer P; van Duynhoven JP; Van der Toorn A; Nicolay K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 22(8):1097-103. PubMed ID: 15527996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants.
    Robertson DD; Weiss PJ; Fishman EK; Magid D; Walker PS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 3351038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose perturbation effect of metallic spinal implants in proton beam therapy.
    Jia Y; Zhao L; Cheng CW; McDonald MW; Das IJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):333-343. PubMed ID: 26699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metal artifact reduction in computed tomography using local models in an image block-iterative scheme.
    Van Slambrouck K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7080-93. PubMed ID: 23127099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CT and MRI Techniques for Imaging Around Orthopedic Hardware.
    Do TD; Sutter R; Skornitzke S; Weber MA
    Rofo; 2018 Jan; 190(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 28934809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Metallic otologic implants: in vitro assessment of ferromagnetism at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Schatz CJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 1902028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The appearance and effects of metallic implants in CT images.
    Kairn T; Crowe SB; Fogg P; Trapp JV
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Jun; 36(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 23760920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metal Artifact Reduction in Virtual Monoenergetic Spectral Dual-Energy CT of Patients With Metallic Orthopedic Implants in the Distal Radius.
    Yoo HJ; Hong SH; Chung BM; Moon SJ; Choi JY; Chae HD; Chang MY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 30240300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reduction of metal artefacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Vandevenne JE; Vanhoenacker FM; Parizel PM; Butts Pauly K; Lang RK
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 18085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
    Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phantom based qualitative and quantitative evaluation of artifacts in MR images of metallic hip prostheses.
    Månsson S; Müller GM; Wellman F; Nittka M; Lundin B
    Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25555906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving MR Image Quality in Patients with Metallic Implants.
    Lee EM; Ibrahim EH; Dudek N; Lu JC; Kalia V; Runge M; Srinivasan A; Stojanovska J; Agarwal PP
    Radiographics; 2021; 41(4):E126-E137. PubMed ID: 34143712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Powder metal-made orthopedic implants with porous surface for fixation by tissue ingrowth.
    Pilliar RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):42-51. PubMed ID: 6851341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-resolution metal artifact reduction MR imaging of the lumbosacral plexus in patients with metallic implants.
    Ahlawat S; Stern SE; Belzberg AJ; Fritz J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(7):897-908. PubMed ID: 28357568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Septal repair implants: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging safety at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Valencerina S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 23(10):1021-5. PubMed ID: 16376188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Orthopedic spinal and hip prostheses: effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts during MR arteriography and venography of abdomen and pelvis.
    Fidelman NA; Wilson MW; Bloom AI; Kerlan RK; LaBerge JM; Gordon RL
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):894-9. PubMed ID: 16926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of Reduced Field-of-View Acquisition to Improve Prostate Cancer Visualization on Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Presence of Hip Implants: Report of 2 Cases.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(2):125-127. PubMed ID: 28478960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.