These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35979522)

  • 1. Behavioral responses of a parasitoid fly to rapidly evolving host signals.
    Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Venable CP; Zonana DM; Ingley SJ; Smith TC; Tinghitella RM
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9193. PubMed ID: 35979522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
    Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CALLING SONGS OF FIELD CRICKETS (TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS) WITH AND WITHOUT PHONOTACTIC PARASITOID INFECTION.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):166-171. PubMed ID: 28568142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Purring Crickets: The Evolution of a Novel Sexual Signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gurule-Small GA; Hallagan CJ; Wilson JD
    Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30444653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular biogeography and host relations of a parasitoid fly.
    Gray DA; Kunerth HD; Zuk M; Cade WH; Balenger SL
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Oct; 9(19):11476-11493. PubMed ID: 31641487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket.
    Beckers OM; Wagner WE
    Anim Behav; 2012 Dec; 84(6):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 23888083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parasitoid-host eavesdropping reveals temperature coupling of preferences to communication signals without genetic coupling.
    Jirik KJ; Dominguez JA; Abdulkarim I; Glaaser J; Stoian ES; Almanza LJ; Lee N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Aug; 290(2005):20230775. PubMed ID: 37583323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signaler-receiver-eavesdropper: Risks and rewards of variation in the dominant frequency of male cricket calls.
    Dobbs OL; Talavera JB; Rossi SM; Menjivar S; Gray DA
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12364-12371. PubMed ID: 33209294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid sexual signal diversification is facilitated by permissive females.
    Zhang R; Rayner JG; Bailey NW
    Curr Biol; 2024 Jan; 34(2):403-409.e3. PubMed ID: 38141618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunogenetic and tolerance strategies against a novel parasitoid of wild field crickets.
    Sikkink KL; Bailey NW; Zuk M; Balenger SL
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):13312-13326. PubMed ID: 33304539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Tinghitella RM
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 17148278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Background noise disrupts host-parasitoid interactions.
    Phillips JN; Ruef SK; Garvin CM; Le MT; Francis CD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Sep; 6(9):190867. PubMed ID: 31598311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in metabolic rates in field crickets and their dipteran parasitoids.
    Kolluru GR; Chappell MA; Zuk M
    J Comp Physiol B; 2004 Nov; 174(8):641-8. PubMed ID: 15538585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences.
    Beckers OM; Wagner WE
    Anim Behav; 2013 Apr; 85(4):. PubMed ID: 24347669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parasitoid flies exploiting acoustic communication of insects-comparative aspects of independent functional adaptations.
    Lakes-Harlan R; Lehmann GU
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Jan; 201(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 25369901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine learning reveals singing rhythms of male Pacific field crickets are clock controlled.
    Westwood ML; Geissmann Q; O'Donnell AJ; Rayner J; Schneider W; Zuk M; Bailey NW; Reece SE
    Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(1):arad098. PubMed ID: 38144906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal.
    Tinghitella RM; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competing adaptations maintain nonadaptive variation in a wild cricket population.
    Rayner JG; Eichenberger F; Bainbridge JVA; Zhang S; Zhang X; Yusuf LH; Balenger S; Gaggiotti OE; Bailey NW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Aug; 121(32):e2317879121. PubMed ID: 39088392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual signal loss: The link between behaviour and rapid evolutionary dynamics in a field cricket.
    Zuk M; Bailey NW; Gray B; Rotenberry JT
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 29417997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.