126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35980490)
21. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review.
Rodgers RJ; Reid GD; Koch J; Deans R; Ledger WL; Friedlander M; Gilchrist RB; Walters KA; Abbott JA
Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 32(5):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 28333356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT.
Peeraer K; Couck I; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2552-62. PubMed ID: 26364081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Study protocol: E-freeze - freezing of embryos in assisted conception: a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.
Maheshwari A; Bhattacharya S; Bowler U; Brison D; Child T; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Harbottle S; Hardy P; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Lewis-Jones C; Macklon N; Raine-Fenning NJ; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Troup S
Reprod Health; 2019 Jun; 16(1):81. PubMed ID: 31196113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience.
Mayeur A; Puy V; Windal V; Hesters L; Gallot V; Benoit A; Grynberg M; Sonigo C; Frydman N
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 33797007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fertility Preservation Success Subsequent to Concurrent Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment and Ovarian Stimulation in Women With Breast Cancer.
Oktay K; Turan V; Bedoschi G; Pacheco FS; Moy F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2424-9. PubMed ID: 26101247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study.
Lind T; Holte J; Olofsson JI; Hadziosmanovic N; Gudmundsson J; Nedstrand E; Lood M; Berglund L; Rodriguez-Wallberg K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 29211889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Blastocyst-stage embryos provide better frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes for young patients with previous fresh embryo transfer failure.
Fang L; He J; Yan Y; Jia Q; Yu Y; Zhang R; Cheng JC; Sun YP
Aging (Albany NY); 2020 Apr; 12(8):6981-6989. PubMed ID: 32294624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Successful pregnancy outcome after cryopreservation of all fresh embryos with subsequent transfer into an unstimulated cycle.
Frederick JL; Ord T; Kettel LM; Stone SC; Balmaceda JP; Asch RH
Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):987-90. PubMed ID: 7589647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Thirteen years' experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments.
Creux H; Monnier P; Son WY; Buckett W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Apr; 35(4):583-592. PubMed ID: 29502188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of aromatase inhibitor on controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation in adolescent and young cancer patients.
Suzuki R; Horage-Okutsu Y; Kawahara T; Nakamura K; Shiraishi E; Iwahata H; Suzuki-Takahashi Y; Sugishita Y; Takae S; Suzuki N
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Mar; 49(3):973-979. PubMed ID: 36606606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survey on the implementation status and reproductive outcomes of oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in Japan: Historical comparison with nationwide surveys.
Takae S; Harada M; Nakamura K; Furuyama S; Ono M; Osuga Y; Suzuki N
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Apr; 50(4):709-718. PubMed ID: 38263596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fertility outcomes in women after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist long protocol: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.
Ding X; Yang J; Li L; Yang N; Lan L; Huang G; Ye H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):207. PubMed ID: 33711956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fresh versus frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in high responders.
Kalem Z; Namli Kalem M; Ruso H; Bakirarar B; Gurgan T
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(8):407-413. PubMed ID: 30215458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation during IVF treatment does not increase the risk of preterm delivery compared to the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in a natural cycle.
Rallis A; Tremellen K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 53(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23577787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]