134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35980707)
1. The within-client alliance-outcome relationship: A response surface analysis.
Hillman JW; Lu Y; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Nov; 69(6):812-822. PubMed ID: 35980707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retraction of Hillman et al. (2022).
J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):435. PubMed ID: 37428765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Congruence about working alliance in Chinese context: The moderating effect of therapists' self-efficacy and the relationship between congruence and psychotherapy outcome.
Lai L; Ren Z; Zhang L; Tao R
J Couns Psychol; 2021 Mar; 68(2):232-246. PubMed ID: 33090875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cultural humility, working alliance, and Outcome Rating Scale in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Between-therapist, within-therapist, and within-client effects.
Dixon KM; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Apr; 69(3):276-286. PubMed ID: 34780206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "The 'roller coaster ride': A longitudinal investigation of the dynamic relationship between Chinese counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome and the mediating effects of working alliance and session evaluation": Correction to Li et al. (2021).
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Jul; 69(4):505. PubMed ID: 35771520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in meaning in life, working alliance, and outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy: What leads to what?
Rim KL; Hill CE; Kivlighan DM
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Nov; 69(6):835-844. PubMed ID: 35925744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A strong alliance is not enough: Item-level variation in an alliance measure moderates the alliance strength and client outcome relationship.
An M; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 35939613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retraction of An et al. (2022).
J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):402. PubMed ID: 37428763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The "roller coaster ride": A longitudinal investigation of the dynamic relationship between Chinese counseling trainees' self-efficacy and their clients' outcome and the mediating effects of working alliance and session evaluation.
Li X; Li F; Lin C; Chen S; Han Y
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Jul; 69(4):490-505. PubMed ID: 34843271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agency and alliance as change factors in psychotherapy.
Huber J; Jennissen S; Nikendei C; Schauenburg H; Dinger U
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2021 Mar; 89(3):214-226. PubMed ID: 33829809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model.
Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ; Baumann E
J Couns Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 26689627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing a mediation model of psychotherapy process and outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Previous client distress, psychodynamic techniques, dyadic working alliance, and current client distress.
Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Ross K; Kline K; Furhmann A; Sauber E
Psychother Res; 2019 Jul; 29(5):581-593. PubMed ID: 29303042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Therapeutic technique diversity is linked to quality of working alliance and client functioning following alliance ruptures.
Chen R; Rafaeli E; Ziv-Beiman S; Bar-Kalifa E; Solomonov N; Barber JP; Peri T; Atzil-Slonim D
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2020 Sep; 88(9):844-858. PubMed ID: 32584116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapeutic alliance predicts symptomatic improvement session by session.
Falkenström F; Granström F; Holmqvist R
J Couns Psychol; 2013 Jul; 60(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 23506511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Client and therapist therapeutic alliance, session evaluation, and client reliable change: a moderated actor-partner interdependence model.
Kivlighan DM; Marmarosh CL; Hilsenroth MJ
J Couns Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 24188649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Where is the relationship" revisited: Using actor-partner interdependence modeling and common fate model in examining dyadic working alliance and session quality.
Li X; O'Connor S; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
J Couns Psychol; 2021 Mar; 68(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 32614193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Therapist and client perceptions of the working alliance: Codevelopment, linear growth, variability, and client functioning.
Lin S; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
J Couns Psychol; 2024 Jan; 71(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 37956033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining between- and within-person effects of the self-stigma of seeking psychological help on the therapeutic working alliance: The moderating role of psychological distress.
Seidman AJ; Vogel DL; Lannin DG
Psychotherapy (Chic); 2023 Jun; 60(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 36951720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in client attachment in relation to client distress: A response surface analysis.
An M; Hillman JW; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
J Couns Psychol; 2022 Jan; 69(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34197146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis.
Marmarosh CL; Kivlighan DM
J Couns Psychol; 2012 Jul; 59(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 22774865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
