BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

635 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35980886)

  • 1. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hatton A; Peng Y; Graves S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A; Agrawal S; Cuthbert A; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
    Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What Is the Long-term Survival for Primary THA With Small-head Metal-on-metal Bearings?
    de Steiger R; Peng A; Lewis P; Graves S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1231-1237. PubMed ID: 29432270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced Revision Rates in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Page RS; Alder-Price AC; Rainbird S; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Peng Y; Holder C; Lorimer MF; Gill SD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1940-1949. PubMed ID: 35901440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?
    Theil C; Schwarze J; Smolle MA; Pützler J; Moellenbeck B; Schneider KN; Schulze M; Klingebiel S; Gosheger G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.
    Farey JE; Masters J; Cuthbert AR; Iversen P; van Steenbergen LN; Prentice HA; Adie S; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR; Paxton EW; Costa ML; Overgaard S; Rogmark C; Rolfson O; Harris IA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1912-1925. PubMed ID: 35767813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
    Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.
    Tsikandylakis G; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Eskelinen A; Mäkelä KT; Hallan G; Furnes ON; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Mohaddes M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2367-2378. PubMed ID: 30260863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Kannan A; Lewis PL; Dyer C; Jiranek WA; McMahon S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jul; 479(7):1548-1558. PubMed ID: 33729206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Does Implant Survivorship Vary with Different Corail Femoral Stem Variants? Results of 51,212 Cases with Up to 30 Years Of Follow-up from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Melbye SM; Haug SCD; Fenstad AM; Furnes O; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 479(10):2169-2180. PubMed ID: 34427568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the Role of Stem Size and Offset in the Risk of Nonseptic Revision of the Exeter® 150-mm Stem? A Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.
    Itayem R; Rolfson O; Mohaddes M; Kärrholm J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 37104550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.