These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35981925)
61. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of mandibular involvement in oral-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Bolzoni A; Cappiello J; Piazza C; Peretti G; Maroldi R; Farina D; Nicolai P Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jul; 130(7):837-43. PubMed ID: 15262760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. What Is Important for Confirming Negative Margins When Resecting Mandibular Ameloblastomas? Peacock ZS; Ji YD; Faquin WC J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 75(6):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 27998738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Mandibular invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: investigation by clinical examination and orthopantomogram. Rao LP; Das SR; Mathews A; Naik BR; Chacko E; Pandey M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jul; 33(5):454-7. PubMed ID: 15183408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Intraoperative Radiographic Assessment of Bone Resection Margins During Mandibulectomy: A Case Series. Shan A; Boahene K; Pitman KT; Blanco RG Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Sep; 100(5_suppl):500S-504S. PubMed ID: 31722565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Update on intraoperative analysis of mandibular margins. Forrest LA; Schuller DE; Karanfilov B; Lucas JG Am J Otolaryngol; 1997; 18(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 9395016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Oral squamous cell carcinoma and the mandible. Cleary KR; Batsakis JG Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1995 Dec; 104(12):977-9. PubMed ID: 7492072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Evaluation of cortical mandibular bone in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Rabelo GD; Coutinho-Camillo C; Kowalski LP; Portero-Muzy N; Roux JP; Chavassieux P; Alves FA Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):783-790. PubMed ID: 28647863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Enhanced Intraoperative Communication of Tumor Margins Using 3D Scanning and Mapping: The Computer-Aided Design Margin. Sharif KF; Prasad K; Miller A; McPeak S; Denney JE; Lewis JS; Topf MC Laryngoscope; 2023 Aug; 133(8):1914-1918. PubMed ID: 36533659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Specimen-driven intraoperative assessment of resection margins should be standard of care for oral cancer patients. Aaboubout Y; Ten Hove I; Smits RWH; Hardillo JA; Puppels GJ; Koljenovic S Oral Dis; 2021 Jan; 27(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 32816373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Frozen Section Evaluation in Head and Neck Oncosurgery: An Initial Experience in a Tertiary Cancer Center. Nayanar SK; M AK; I MK; Thavarool P SB; Thiagarajan S Turk Patoloji Derg; 2019; 35(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 30614511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Variation of resection margins in oral cancer in dependence of tumor stage and subsite - a retrospective cohort study. Moratin J; Horn D; Oehme M; Semmelmayer K; Flechtenmacher C; Ristow O; Held T; Engel M; Hoffmann J; Freudlsperger C Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):327. PubMed ID: 38764079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Rim versus sagittal mandibulectomy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma: two types of mandibular preservation. Guerra MF; Campo FJ; Gías LN; Pérez JS Head Neck; 2003 Dec; 25(12):982-9. PubMed ID: 14648856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Margin Practices in Oral Cavity Cancer Resections: Survey of American Head and Neck Society Members. Bulbul MG; Zenga J; Tarabichi O; Parikh AS; Sethi RK; Robbins KT; Puram SV; Varvares MA Laryngoscope; 2021 Apr; 131(4):782-787. PubMed ID: 32827312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The value of frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph node in clinically N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Tschopp L; Nuyens M; Stauffer E; Krause T; Zbären P Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jan; 132(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 15632917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Frozen section versus gross examination for bone marrow margin assessment during sarcoma resection. Anderson ME; Miller PE; van Nostrand K; Vargas SO Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):836-41. PubMed ID: 23619736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Value of the supraomohyoid neck dissection with frozen section analysis as a staging procedure in the clinically negative neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. van den Hoogen FJ; Manni JJ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1992; 249(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 1642866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of bone invasion in oral cancer: Comparison with conventional computed tomography. Czerwonka L; Bissada E; Goldstein DP; Wood RE; Lam EW; Yu E; Lazinski D; Irish JC Head Neck; 2017 Oct; 39(10):2016-2020. PubMed ID: 28703386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Do frozen sections help achieve adequate surgical margins in the resection of oral carcinoma? Ribeiro NF; Godden DR; Wilson GE; Butterworth DM; Woodwards RT Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 32(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 12729775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Positive margins matter regardless of subsequent resection findings. Coutu B; Ryan E; Christensen D; Lawrence E; Bell EB; Zhen W; Sayed Z Oral Oncol; 2022 May; 128():105850. PubMed ID: 35436713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A prospective study of intraoperative assessment of mucosal squamous cell carcinoma margins in the head and neck. Smithers FAE; Haymerle G; Palme CE; Low TH; Froggatt C; Gupta R; Clark JR Head Neck; 2021 Feb; 43(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 33098251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]