These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35984589)

  • 1. Covalent docking in CDOCKER.
    Wu Y; Brooks Iii CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Aug; 36(8):563-574. PubMed ID: 35984589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
    Wu Y; Brooks CL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding Mode Prediction and Virtual Screening Applications by Covalent Docking.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():73-88. PubMed ID: 33759121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Covalent Docking in Drug Discovery: Scope and Limitations.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    Curr Pharm Des; 2020; 26(44):5684-5699. PubMed ID: 33155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HCovDock: an efficient docking method for modeling covalent protein-ligand interactions.
    Wu Q; Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36573474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Docking covalent targets for drug discovery: stimulating the computer-aided drug design community of possible pitfalls and erroneous practices.
    Oyedele AK; Ogunlana AT; Boyenle ID; Adeyemi AO; Rita TO; Adelusi TI; Abdul-Hammed M; Elegbeleye OE; Odunitan TT
    Mol Divers; 2023 Aug; 27(4):1879-1903. PubMed ID: 36057867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DOCKTITE-a highly versatile step-by-step workflow for covalent docking and virtual screening in the molecular operating environment.
    Scholz C; Knorr S; Hamacher K; Schmidt B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 25541749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual Screening of Novel Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Synthase Inhibitors.
    Lather A; Sharma S; Khatkar A
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2018; 21(3):182-193. PubMed ID: 29600755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docking covalent inhibitors: a parameter free approach to pose prediction and scoring.
    Zhu K; Borrelli KW; Greenwood JR; Day T; Abel R; Farid RS; Harder E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1932-40. PubMed ID: 24916536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accelerated CDOCKER with GPUs, Parallel Simulated Annealing, and Fast Fourier Transforms.
    Ding X; Wu Y; Wang Y; Vilseck JZ; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jun; 16(6):3910-3919. PubMed ID: 32374996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. WIDOCK: a reactive docking protocol for virtual screening of covalent inhibitors.
    Scarpino A; Petri L; Knez D; Imre T; Ábrányi-Balogh P; Ferenczy GG; Gobec S; Keserű GM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):223-244. PubMed ID: 33458809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CovalentDock: automated covalent docking with parameterized covalent linkage energy estimation and molecular geometry constraints.
    Ouyang X; Zhou S; Su CT; Ge Z; Li R; Kwoh CK
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Feb; 34(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 23034731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-Step Covalent Docking with Attracting Cavities.
    Goullieux M; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7847-7859. PubMed ID: 38049143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative assessment of different statistical instruments and measures for the prediction of promising outcomes using docking, virtual screening and ADMET analysis against HIV-RT.
    Shamshad H; Saeed M; Ul-Haq Z; Halim SA; Gul S; Mirza AZ
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2022 Oct; 40(17):7680-7692. PubMed ID: 33779506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Docking of Covalent Ligands: Challenges and Approaches.
    Sotriffer C
    Mol Inform; 2018 Sep; 37(9-10):e1800062. PubMed ID: 29927068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.
    Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.