These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35984623)

  • 1. Text validation: Overlooking consistency effect discrepancies.
    Singer M; Spear J; Rodrigo-Tamarit M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):437-454. PubMed ID: 35984623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Text validation: Overlooking discrepancies in question constructions.
    Singer M; Spear J; Spence AJ; Anderson JR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Jun; 77(2):85-97. PubMed ID: 36729487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of strongly presupposed text concepts in reading comprehension: Cleft constructions.
    Singer M; Spear J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31647253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From simple agents to information sources: Readers' differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency.
    Saux G; Vibert N; Dampuré J; Burin DI; Britt MA; Rouet JF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103191. PubMed ID: 33147538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ; Corina DP; Morford JP; Hafer S; Hoversten LJ;
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 23868696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroscientific information bias in metacomprehension: the effect of brain images on metacomprehension judgment of neuroscience research.
    Ikeda K; Kitagami S; Takahashi T; Hattori Y; Ito Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1357-63. PubMed ID: 23728726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validating presupposed versus focused text information.
    Singer M; Solar KG; Spear J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):456-479. PubMed ID: 27913966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration Processes Compared: Cortical Differences for Consistency Evaluation and Passive Comprehension in Local and Global Coherence.
    Egidi G; Caramazza A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1568-83. PubMed ID: 27243613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Young readers' use of phonological information: phonological awareness, memory, and comprehension.
    Gray A; McCutchen D
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 16895157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readers' use of source information in text comprehension.
    Braasch JL; Rouet JF; Vibert N; Britt MA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):450-65. PubMed ID: 22086649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.
    Calloway RC; Helder A; Perfetti CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):899-931. PubMed ID: 35505178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension.
    Wang R; Mo L; He X; Smythe I; Wang S
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 22044009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.
    Sparks JR; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):230-47. PubMed ID: 21244116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.
    Long DL; Wilson J; Hurley R; Prat CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 16822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of phonological loop on inferential processing during Chinese text reading: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Wang W; Fan L; Wang Z; Liu X; Zhang S
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):521-533. PubMed ID: 33934520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Searching for Judy: how small mysteries affect narrative processes and memory.
    Love J; McKoon G; Gerrig RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 20438273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Materials Matter: An Exploration of Text Complexity and Its Effects on Middle School Readers' Comprehension Processing.
    Dahl AC; Carlson SE; Renken M; McCarthy KS; Reynolds E
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Apr; 52(2):702-716. PubMed ID: 33784193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences.
    Tavares G; Fajardo I; Ávila V; Salmerón L; Ferrer A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015 Mar; 38():108-24. PubMed ID: 25556895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning from texts: activation of information from previous texts during reading.
    Beker K; Jolles D; Lorch RF; van den Broek P
    Read Writ; 2016; 29():1161-1178. PubMed ID: 27340334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.