These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare. Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle? Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior. Verdon M; Langworthy A; Rawnsley R J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7084-7094. PubMed ID: 33814145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of eprinomectin on grazing behaviour and performance in dairy cattle with sub-clinical gastrointestinal nematode infections under continuous stocking management. Forbes AB; Huckle CA; Gibb MJ Vet Parasitol; 2004 Nov; 125(3-4):353-64. PubMed ID: 15482891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential of virtual fencing technology to facilitate sustainable livestock grazing management. Schillings J; Holohan C; Lively F; Arnott G; Russell T Animal; 2024 Aug; 18(8):101231. PubMed ID: 39053155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortisol in Manure from Cattle Enclosed with Nofence Virtual Fencing. Sonne C; Alstrup AKO; Pertoldi C; Frikke J; Linder AC; Styrishave B Animals (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 36359141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effectiveness of Virtual Fencing of Bull Calves in a Holistic Grazing System. Staahltoft SK; Aaser MF; Jensen JNS; Zadran I; Sørensen EB; Nielsen AE; Alstrup AKO; Bruhn D; Linder AC; Sonne C; Frikke J; Pertoldi C Animals (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36899774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare. Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep. Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of co-grazing dairy heifers with goats on animal performance, dry matter yield, and pasture forage composition. Dennis TS; Unruh-Snyder LJ; Neary MK; Nennich TD J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4467-77. PubMed ID: 22952353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and nontanniferous legumes: implications for foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol in beef cattle. Lagrange S; MacAdam JW; Stegelmeier B; Villalba JJ J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34657159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-Exposure to an Electrical Stimulus Primes Associative Pairing of Audio and Electrical Stimuli for Dairy Heifers in a Virtual Fencing Feed Attractant Trial. Verdon M; Lee C; Marini D; Rawnsley R Animals (Basel); 2020 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32013020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines. Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]