These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35985122)

  • 1. Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing.
    Hamidi D; Grinnell NA; Komainda M; Riesch F; Horn J; Ammer S; Traulsen I; Palme R; Hamidi M; Isselstein J
    Animal; 2022 Sep; 16(9):100614. PubMed ID: 35985122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress indicators in dairy cows adapting to virtual fencing.
    Fuchs P; Stachowicz J; Schneider MK; Probo M; Bruckmaier RM; Umstätter C
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38271563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A matter of age? How age affects the adaptation of lactating dairy cows to virtual fencing.
    Confessore A; Schneider MK; Pauler CM; Aquilani C; Fuchs P; Pugliese C; Dibari C; Argenti G; Accorsi PA; Probo M
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38743503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do grazing beef and dairy cattle respond to virtual fences? A review.
    Wilms L; Komainda M; Hamidi D; Riesch F; Horn J; Isselstein J
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38619181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system.
    Brunberg EI; Bergslid IK; Bøe KE; Sørheim KM
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2045-2050. PubMed ID: 28490388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. I: Technology efficacy and pasture utilization.
    Langworthy AD; Verdon M; Freeman MJ; Corkrey R; Hills JL; Rawnsley RP
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7071-7083. PubMed ID: 33814143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle?
    Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior.
    Verdon M; Langworthy A; Rawnsley R
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7084-7094. PubMed ID: 33814145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of eprinomectin on grazing behaviour and performance in dairy cattle with sub-clinical gastrointestinal nematode infections under continuous stocking management.
    Forbes AB; Huckle CA; Gibb MJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2004 Nov; 125(3-4):353-64. PubMed ID: 15482891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The potential of virtual fencing technology to facilitate sustainable livestock grazing management.
    Schillings J; Holohan C; Lively F; Arnott G; Russell T
    Animal; 2024 Aug; 18(8):101231. PubMed ID: 39053155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortisol in Manure from Cattle Enclosed with Nofence Virtual Fencing.
    Sonne C; Alstrup AKO; Pertoldi C; Frikke J; Linder AC; Styrishave B
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 36359141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effectiveness of Virtual Fencing of Bull Calves in a Holistic Grazing System.
    Staahltoft SK; Aaser MF; Jensen JNS; Zadran I; Sørensen EB; Nielsen AE; Alstrup AKO; Bruhn D; Linder AC; Sonne C; Frikke J; Pertoldi C
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36899774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare.
    Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep.
    Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of co-grazing dairy heifers with goats on animal performance, dry matter yield, and pasture forage composition.
    Dennis TS; Unruh-Snyder LJ; Neary MK; Nennich TD
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4467-77. PubMed ID: 22952353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grazing diverse combinations of tanniferous and nontanniferous legumes: implications for foraging behavior, performance, and hair cortisol in beef cattle.
    Lagrange S; MacAdam JW; Stegelmeier B; Villalba JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34657159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-Exposure to an Electrical Stimulus Primes Associative Pairing of Audio and Electrical Stimuli for Dairy Heifers in a Virtual Fencing Feed Attractant Trial.
    Verdon M; Lee C; Marini D; Rawnsley R
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32013020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems.
    Aquilani C; Confessore A; Bozzi R; Sirtori F; Pugliese C
    Animal; 2022 Jan; 16(1):100429. PubMed ID: 34953277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.