These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35985477)

  • 21. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Comparative Study between Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Faster and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard in Glaucoma Patients.
    Mendieta N; Suárez J; Blasco C; Muñiz R; Pueyo C
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2021; 33(3):247-252. PubMed ID: 34765810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA).
    Tan JCK; Yohannan J; Ramulu PY; Kalloniatis M; Crabb DP; Crowston J; Phu J
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2025; 70(1):141-152. PubMed ID: 39349186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing Static Perimetry Protocols of Central Field Testing among Patients with Glaucoma.
    Behera G; Nath A; Ramasamy A; Kaliaperumal S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jun; 100(6):406-411. PubMed ID: 37129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of moderate smoking on the central visual field.
    Akarsu C; Yazici B; Taner P; Ergin A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 15291937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S; Uzun S; Mocan MC; Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Converting to SITA-standard from full-threshold visual field testing in the follow-up phase of a clinical trial.
    Musch DC; Gillespie BW; Motyka BM; Niziol LM; Mills RP; Lichter PR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2755-9. PubMed ID: 16043847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
    Doozandeh A; Irandoost F; Mirzajani A; Yazdani S; Pakravan M; Esfandiari H
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
    Heijl A; Patella VM; Chong LX; Iwase A; Leung CK; Tuulonen A; Lee GC; Callan T; Bengtsson B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Ng M; Racette L; Pascual JP; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Lovell SL; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1726-33. PubMed ID: 19074800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.