132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35986329)
1. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Rehm A; Ashby E; Granger L; Ong JCY
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Aug; 17(1):394. PubMed ID: 35986329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao H; Xu S; Liu G; Zhao J; Wu S; Peng L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):366. PubMed ID: 34107972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of ultrasound in the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in supracondylar humeral fractures.
Rehm A; Ong JCY; Kobezda T; Ashby E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 35148804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateral versus cross pinning in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Kwok SM; Clayworth C; Nara N
ANZ J Surg; 2021 May; 91(5):980-985. PubMed ID: 33792121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: When Lateral Entry Pins Are Not Enough.
Fabricant PD
Instr Course Lect; 2024; 73():421-425. PubMed ID: 38090913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateral-Only Kirschner-Wire Fixation of Type-3 Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children with a Special Attention to Technical Issues.
Hannonen J; Pokka T; Serlo W; Sinikumpu JJ
Scand J Surg; 2021 Jun; 110(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 32116116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medial and lateral crossed pinning versus lateral pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: decision analysis.
Lee KM; Chung CY; Gwon DK; Sung KH; Kim TW; Choi IH; Cho TJ; Yoo WJ; Park MS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 22327446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of the distance between the anterior humeral line and capitellum as a quantitative measure of supracondylar humeral fracture in children.
Sato K; Mimata Y; Takahashi G; Murakami K; Ouchi S; Shiraishi H; Numata N; Doita M
Injury; 2020 Jun; 51(6):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 32340732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of lateral entry with crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis.
Na Y; Bai R; Zhao Z; Han C; Kong L; Ren Y; Liu W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):68. PubMed ID: 29615086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impacts of Fracture Types on Success Rate of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning in Pediatric Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures Displaced >4 mm.
Rehm A; Thahir A; Granger L; Ashby E
J Pediatr Orthop; 2023 Feb; 43(2):e190-e191. PubMed ID: 35969009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric distal humeral supracondylar fracture - achievement of optimal pinning configuration.
Chong HH; Qureshi A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Jun; 88(2):245-254. PubMed ID: 36001829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial-lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus.
Prashant K; Lakhotia D; Bhattacharyya TD; Mahanta AK; Ravoof A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 27312248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Older Children: Success of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning.
Rehm A; Thahir A; Ngu A
J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 May-Jun 01; 42(5):e550. PubMed ID: 33999565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical stability study of three techniques used in the fixation of transverse and oblique metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus in children: a finite element analysis.
Liu C; Kamara A; Liu T; Yan Y; Wang E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):34. PubMed ID: 32020882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of crossed versus lateral entry K-wire fixation of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dekker AE; Krijnen P; Schipper IB
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2391-2398. PubMed ID: 27596688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A two-stage retrospective analysis to determine the effect of entry point on higher exit of proximal pins in lateral pinning of supracondylar humerus fracture in children.
Ji X; Kamara A; Wang E; Liu T; Shi L; Li L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 14(1):351. PubMed ID: 31706361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is lateral pin fixation for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus better than crossed pins in children?
Zhao JG; Wang J; Zhang P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2942-53. PubMed ID: 23653099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar humerus fracture pinning for fractures with coronal lateral obliquity.
Feng C; Guo Y; Zhu Z; Zhang J; Wang Y
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 22327455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pinning of supracondylar fractures in children - Strategies to avoid complications.
Rupp M; Schäfer C; Heiss C; Alt V
Injury; 2019 Jun; 50 Suppl 1():S2-S9. PubMed ID: 30955872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of pinning in supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children.
Woratanarat P; Angsanuntsukh C; Rattanasiri S; Attia J; Woratanarat T; Thakkinstian A
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jan; 26(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 21909033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
