These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35986666)

  • 1. Estimating the True Cost of Garden Pathing: A Computational Model of Latent Cognitive Processes.
    Paape D; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Aug; 46(8):e13186. PubMed ID: 35986666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis.
    Ferreira F; Christianson K; Hollingworth A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 Jan; 30(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11291182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.
    Peristeri E; Tsimpli IM; Dardiotis E; Tsapkini K
    Aphasiology; 2020; 34(8):943-969. PubMed ID: 32952261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger.
    Christianson K; Hollingworth A; Halliwell JF; Ferreira F
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Jun; 42(4):368-407. PubMed ID: 11368528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis.
    Staub A
    J Mem Lang; 2007 Aug; 57(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 19593394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causality and signalling of garden-path sentences.
    Wang D; Sadrzadeh M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Mar; 382(2268):20230013. PubMed ID: 38281713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online revision process in clause-boundary garden-path sentences.
    Fujita H
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 37468668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences.
    Meseguer E; Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 12184556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.
    Chromý J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 34289762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Garden-path sentences and the diversity of their (mis)representations.
    Ceháková M; Chromý J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288817. PubMed ID: 37463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.
    Liversedge SP; Paterson KB; Clayes EL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):225-40. PubMed ID: 11873848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hopf JM; Bader M; Meng M; Bayer J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 12429368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension.
    Vuong LC; Martin RC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2015; 32(5):243-65. PubMed ID: 26216232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of early-closure garden-path processing: Effects of prosody and plausibility.
    den Ouden DB; Dickey MW; Anderson C; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):926-49. PubMed ID: 25801097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenging prior evidence for a shared syntactic processor for language and music.
    Perruchet P; Poulin-Charronnat B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 23180417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.