These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35987091)

  • 21. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A metric study of insole foot impressions in footwear of identical twins.
    Nirenberg MS; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():116-121. PubMed ID: 28918370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Bajic SJ
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100221. PubMed ID: 35243285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts.
    Hicklin RA; Winer KR; Kish PE; Parks CL; Chapman W; Dunagan K; Richetelli N; Epstein EG; Ausdemore MA; Busey TA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110856. PubMed ID: 34116402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validating strength-of-support conclusion scales for fingerprint, footwear, and toolmark impressions.
    Busey T; Klutzke M; Nuzzi A; Vanderkolk J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):936-954. PubMed ID: 35322424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Impact of Fatigue on Decision-Making in the Footwear Examination: Evidence from Questionnaires and Eye-Tracking Test.
    Yu Y; Luo Y; Xie W; Lin S; Liu L
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1991-1999. PubMed ID: 32745268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: The generation of footwear marks in blood.
    McElhone RL; Meakin GE; French JC; Alexander T; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():34-40. PubMed ID: 27017082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Empirical Evaluation of the Reliability of Photogrammetry Software in the Recovery of Three-Dimensional Footwear Impressions.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 32407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of enhancement techniques for footwear impressions on dark and patterned fabrics.
    Farrugia KJ; Bandey H; Dawson L; Daéid NN
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1472-85. PubMed ID: 23786301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning.
    Thompson TJU; Norris P
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 29685306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digitally processing an image of a shoe impression in blood.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Chaikovsky A; Cohen Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 33332705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigating forensic document examiners' skill relating to opinions on photocopied signatures.
    Found B; Rogers DK
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 16686271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Footwear Assessment Form: a reliable clinical tool to assess footwear characteristics of relevance to postural stability in older adults.
    Menz HB; Sherrington C
    Clin Rehabil; 2000 Dec; 14(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 11128742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of non-contact scanning to forensic podiatry: A feasibility study.
    Crowther M; Reidy S; Walker J; Islam M; Thompson T
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33357830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison between visible wavelength hyperspectral imaging and digital photography for the detection and identification of bloodstained footwear marks.
    Crowther M; Li B; Thompson T; Islam M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2424-2437. PubMed ID: 34363402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examination of the possibility to use Siamese networks for the comparison of firing pin marks.
    Giverts P; Sorokina K; Fedorenko V
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Nov; 67(6):2416-2424. PubMed ID: 36149037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Collaborative study of speaker identiication by the voiceprint method.
    Smrkovski LL
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1975 May; 58(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 1141171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.