194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989166)
1. A paradigmatic shift in the care of male factor infertility: how can the recommendations for basic semen examination in the sixth edition of the WHO manual and the ISO 23162:2021 standard help?
Björndahl L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Oct; 45(4):731-736. PubMed ID: 35989166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do studies published in two leading reproduction journals between 2011 and 2020 demonstrate that they followed WHO5 recommendations for basic semen analysis?
Vasconcelos AL; Campbell MJ; Barratt CLR; Gellatly SA
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2255-2263. PubMed ID: 35947767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended semen examinations in the sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: contributing to the understanding of the function of the male reproductive system.
Baldi E; Gallagher MT; Krasnyak S; Kirkman-Brown J;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 34986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of the basic semen analysis and processing sperm.
Schardein JN; Fendereski K; Hotaling JM
Curr Opin Urol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 36226727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates.
Björndahl L; Kirkman Brown J;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 34986984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semen parameter thresholds and time-to-conception in subfertile couples: how high is high enough?
Keihani S; Verrilli LE; Zhang C; Presson AP; Hanson HA; Pastuszak AW; Johnstone EB; Hotaling JM
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2121-2133. PubMed ID: 34097024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The risk of birth defects is not associated with semen parameters or mode of conception in offspring of men visiting a reproductive health clinic.
Pastuszak AW; Herati AS; Eisenberg ML; Cengiz C; Langlois PH; Kohn TP; Lamb DJ; Lipshultz LI
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):733-739. PubMed ID: 30753581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of the WHO "Semen" processing manual from the first (1980) to the sixth edition (2021).
Wang C; Mbizvo M; Festin MP; Björndahl L; Toskin I;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34996596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure.
Sikka SC; Hellstrom WJ
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(3):392-401. PubMed ID: 27056346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality.
Hanson HA; Mayer EN; Anderson RE; Aston KI; Carrell DT; Berger J; Lowrance WT; Smith KR; Hotaling JM
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):239-247. PubMed ID: 27927843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system.
Hamilton JA; Cissen M; Brandes M; Smeenk JM; de Bruin JP; Kremer JA; Nelen WL; Hamilton CJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1110-21. PubMed ID: 25788568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we?
Esteves SC
Nat Rev Urol; 2022 Jul; 19(7):439-446. PubMed ID: 35523961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Villani MT; Morini D; Spaggiari G; Falbo AI; Melli B; La Sala GB; Romeo M; Simoni M; Aguzzoli L; Santi D
Andrology; 2022 Feb; 10(2):310-321. PubMed ID: 34723422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests.
Wang C; Swerdloff RS
Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1502-7. PubMed ID: 25458617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.
Paffoni A; Somigliana E; Boeri L; Viganò P
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 35849333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ["Practical spermiogram"-semen analysis according to WHO recommendations].
Kliesch S
Urologe A; 2021 May; 60(5):647-656. PubMed ID: 33929550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen.
Sharma R; Harlev A; Agarwal A; Esteves SC
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):635-645. PubMed ID: 27113031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Semen analysis: spermiogram according to WHO criteria].
Kliesch S; Cooper TG
Urologe A; 2008 Dec; 47(12):1548, 1550-4. PubMed ID: 18953523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geographic variation in semen parameters from data used for the World Health Organization semen analysis reference ranges.
Feferkorn I; Azani L; Kadour-Peero E; Hizkiyahu R; Shrem G; Salmon-Divon M; Dahan MH
Fertil Steril; 2022 Sep; 118(3):475-482. PubMed ID: 35750517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]