174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989668)
1. A Multi-institutional Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of the Implementation of Constructed Response Exam Questions.
Olvet DM; Bird JB; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Papp KK; Qua K; Willey JM; Brenner JM
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(5):609-622. PubMed ID: 35989668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What have we learned about constructed response short-answer questions from students and faculty? A multi-institutional study.
Brenner JM; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Bird JB; Willey J; Qua K; Olvet DM
Med Teach; 2024 Mar; 46(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 37688773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should multiple-choice questions get the SAQ? Development of a short-answer question writing rubric.
Nguyentan DC; Gruenberg K; Shin J
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 May; 14(5):591-596. PubMed ID: 35715099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and Validation of a Tool to Evaluate the Evolution of Clinical Reasoning in Trauma Using Virtual Patients.
Fleiszer D; Hoover ML; Posel N; Razek T; Bergman S
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 28927667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.
Bird JB; Olvet DM; Willey JM; Brenner J
Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1649959. PubMed ID: 31438809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students.
Yune SJ; Lee SY; Im SJ; Kam BS; Baek SY
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 29871677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC
Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of an Analytical Grading Rubric for Self-Assessment: A Pilot Study for a Periodontal Oral Competency Examination in Predoctoral Dental Education.
Satheesh KM; Brockmann LB; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1429-36. PubMed ID: 26632297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment to Optimize Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions.
Wlodarczyk S; Muller-Juge V; Hauer KE; Tong MS; Ransohoff A; Boscardin C
Teach Learn Med; 2021; 33(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 33439035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing, evaluating and validating a scoring rubric for written case reports.
Cyr PR; Smith KA; Broyles IL; Holt CT
Int J Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 5():18-23. PubMed ID: 25341207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardized Multi-Institutional Mock Oral Examination: A Feasible and Valuable Educational Experience for General Surgery Residents.
Lu Y; Miranda R; Quach C; Girgis M; Lewis CE; Tillou A; Chen F
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(6):1568-1576. PubMed ID: 32505673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancing Examination Success: the Cumulative Benefits of Self-Assessment Questions and Virtual Patient Cases.
Seagrave MP; Foster-Johnson L; Waits JB; Margo K; Leong SL
Med Sci Educ; 2022 Oct; 32(5):985-993. PubMed ID: 36276775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.
Villa KR; Sprunger TL; Walton AM; Costello TJ; Isaacs AN
Am J Pharm Educ; 2020 Jul; 84(7):ajpe7648. PubMed ID: 32773823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 26757931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs.
Lertsakulbunlue S; Kantiwong A
BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):572. PubMed ID: 38789958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Norming a VALUE rubric to assess graduate information literacy skills.
Turbow DJ; Evener J
J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jul; 104(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 27366121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.
Bullock JL; Seligman L; Lai CJ; O'Sullivan PS; Hauer KE
Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 34014793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.
Gamroth L; Budgen C; Lougheed M
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont); 2006 Sep; 19(3):e1-14. PubMed ID: 19830923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
