These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989668)
1. A Multi-institutional Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of the Implementation of Constructed Response Exam Questions. Olvet DM; Bird JB; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Papp KK; Qua K; Willey JM; Brenner JM Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(5):609-622. PubMed ID: 35989668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What have we learned about constructed response short-answer questions from students and faculty? A multi-institutional study. Brenner JM; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Bird JB; Willey J; Qua K; Olvet DM Med Teach; 2024 Mar; 46(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 37688773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should multiple-choice questions get the SAQ? Development of a short-answer question writing rubric. Nguyentan DC; Gruenberg K; Shin J Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 May; 14(5):591-596. PubMed ID: 35715099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and Validation of a Tool to Evaluate the Evolution of Clinical Reasoning in Trauma Using Virtual Patients. Fleiszer D; Hoover ML; Posel N; Razek T; Bergman S J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 28927667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME. Bird JB; Olvet DM; Willey JM; Brenner J Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1649959. PubMed ID: 31438809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students. Yune SJ; Lee SY; Im SJ; Kam BS; Baek SY BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 29871677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE. Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of an Analytical Grading Rubric for Self-Assessment: A Pilot Study for a Periodontal Oral Competency Examination in Predoctoral Dental Education. Satheesh KM; Brockmann LB; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1429-36. PubMed ID: 26632297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment to Optimize Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions. Wlodarczyk S; Muller-Juge V; Hauer KE; Tong MS; Ransohoff A; Boscardin C Teach Learn Med; 2021; 33(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 33439035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing, evaluating and validating a scoring rubric for written case reports. Cyr PR; Smith KA; Broyles IL; Holt CT Int J Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 5():18-23. PubMed ID: 25341207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardized Multi-Institutional Mock Oral Examination: A Feasible and Valuable Educational Experience for General Surgery Residents. Lu Y; Miranda R; Quach C; Girgis M; Lewis CE; Tillou A; Chen F J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(6):1568-1576. PubMed ID: 32505673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancing Examination Success: the Cumulative Benefits of Self-Assessment Questions and Virtual Patient Cases. Seagrave MP; Foster-Johnson L; Waits JB; Margo K; Leong SL Med Sci Educ; 2022 Oct; 32(5):985-993. PubMed ID: 36276775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format. Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 26757931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses. Villa KR; Sprunger TL; Walton AM; Costello TJ; Isaacs AN Am J Pharm Educ; 2020 Jul; 84(7):ajpe7648. PubMed ID: 32773823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs. Lertsakulbunlue S; Kantiwong A BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):572. PubMed ID: 38789958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Norming a VALUE rubric to assess graduate information literacy skills. Turbow DJ; Evener J J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jul; 104(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 27366121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise. Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input. Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback. Bullock JL; Seligman L; Lai CJ; O'Sullivan PS; Hauer KE Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 34014793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]