These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989731)

  • 1. The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):911-937. PubMed ID: 35989731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.
    Du H; Bentler PM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 34166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sensitivity of structural equation modeling with ordinal data to underlying non-normality and observed distributional forms.
    Foldnes N; Grønneberg S
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):541-567. PubMed ID: 33793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit.
    Gegenfurtner A
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1037111. PubMed ID: 36389589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.
    Pavlov G; Maydeu-Olivares A; Shi D
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Feb; 81(1):110-130. PubMed ID: 33456064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating Latent Variable Interactions With Non-Normal Observed Data: A Comparison of Four Approaches.
    Cham H; West SG; Ma Y; Aiken LS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Nov; 47(6):840-876. PubMed ID: 23457417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of model fit in nonlinear multilevel structural equation modeling.
    Schermelleh-Engel K; Kerwer M; Klein AG
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():181. PubMed ID: 24624110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables.
    Jung K; Panko P; Lee J; Hwang H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2461. PubMed ID: 30568625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence testing to judge model fit: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Peugh JL; Litson K; Feldon DF
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37561492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A semiparametric Bayesian approach for structural equation models.
    Song XY; Pan JH; Kwok T; Vandenput L; Ohlsson C; Leung PC
    Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):314-32. PubMed ID: 20533410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations.
    Sideridis G; Simos P; Papanicolaou A; Fletcher J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2014 Oct; 74(5):733-758. PubMed ID: 25435589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models.
    Kaplan D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1988 Jan; 23(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 26782258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-Nonparametric Methods for Detecting Latent Non-normality: A Fusion of Latent Trait and Ordered Latent Class Modeling.
    Schmitt JE; Mehta PD; Aggen SH; Kubarych TS; Neale MC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):427-43. PubMed ID: 26794913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.