These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989731)

  • 21. Generating Correlated, Non-normally Distributed Data Using a Non-linear Structural Model.
    Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 26059646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementing continuous non-normal skewed distributions in latent growth mixture modeling: An assessment of specification errors and class enumeration.
    Depaoli S; Winter SD; Lai K; Guerra-Peña K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):795-821. PubMed ID: 31012738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Residual Normality Assumption and the Estimation of Multiple Membership Random Effects Models.
    Chen J; Leroux AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 30521398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
    Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling.
    Ryu E
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1066-74. PubMed ID: 21671139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: non-normal data and small sample sizes.
    Hau KT; Marsh HW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):327-51. PubMed ID: 15511312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Generating Multivariate Ordinal Data via Entropy Principles.
    Lee Y; Kaplan D
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):156-181. PubMed ID: 29359242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models With Small Sample Sizes.
    Lüdtke O; Ulitzsch E; Robitzsch A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615162. PubMed ID: 33995176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT MODELS FOR JOINT MODELING BINARY AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN LONGITUDINAL DATA.
    Kürüm E; Li R; Shiffman S; Yao W
    Stat Sin; 2016 Jul; 26(3):979-1000. PubMed ID: 27667908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A density based empirical likelihood approach for testing bivariate normality.
    Gurevich G; Vexler A
    J Stat Comput Simul; 2018; 88(13):2540-2560. PubMed ID: 31223176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ventura-León J; Peña-Calero BN; Burga-León A
    J Gen Psychol; 2023; 150(4):405-422. PubMed ID: 35792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Comparison of Regularized Maximum-Likelihood, Regularized 2-Stage Least Squares, and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation with Misspecified Models, Small Samples, and Weak Factor Structure.
    Finch WH; Miller JE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):608-626. PubMed ID: 32324059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Quasi-Likelihood Approach to Assess Model Fit in Quadratic and Interaction SEM.
    Büchner RD; Klein AG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):855-872. PubMed ID: 31825255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app.
    Jak S; Jorgensen TD; Verdam MGE; Oort FJ; Elffers L
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1385-1406. PubMed ID: 33140375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling.
    Moshagen M; Auerswald M
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):318-336. PubMed ID: 28301200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Identification and Estimation of Nonlinear Models Using Two Samples with Nonclassical Measurement Errors.
    Carroll RJ; Chen X; Hu Y
    J Nonparametr Stat; 2010 May; 22(4):379-399. PubMed ID: 20495685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.