These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35989835)

  • 1. Looking for a Silver Lining to the Dark Cloud: A Google Trends Analysis of Contraceptive Interest in the United States Post Roe vs. Wade Verdict.
    Datta PK; Chowdhury SR; Aravindan A; Nath S; Sen P
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27012. PubMed ID: 35989835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Interest in Permanent Contraception Peaked Following the Leaked Supreme Court Majority Opinion of Roe vs. Wade: A Cross-Sectional Google Trends Analysis.
    Ghomeshi A; Diaz P; Henry V; Ramasamy R; Masterson TA
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30582. PubMed ID: 36420253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term benefits and risks of alternative methods of fertility control in the United States.
    Kawachi I; Colditz GA; Hankinson S
    Contraception; 1994 Jul; 50(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 7924318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
    Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contraceptive use--United States and territories, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002.
    Bensyl DM; Iuliano DA; Carter M; Santelli J; Gilbert BC
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Nov; 54(6):1-72. PubMed ID: 16292246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.
    Flett G; Gurney E; McKessock L; Reid J
    Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Apr; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9719702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
    Cohen SA
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shining the light on abortion: Drivers of online abortion searches across the United States in 2018.
    Guendelman S; Yon E; Pleasants E; Hubbard A; Prata N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231672. PubMed ID: 32437369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction of the pill and its impact.
    Tyrer L
    Contraception; 1999 Jan; 59(1 Suppl):11S-16S. PubMed ID: 10342090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in contraception and sterilization in Australia.
    Santow G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1804078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mortality associated with fertility and fertility control: 1983.
    Ory HW
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 6671477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to Access Google Data and Gain Insights Into Searches on Birth Control in Louisiana and Mississippi, 2014-2018: Infoveillance Study.
    Prata N; Weidert K; Zepecki A; Yon E; Pleasants E; Sams-Abiodun P; Guendelman S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e25923. PubMed ID: 34255662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
    Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.
    Cook RJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The birth control movement before Roe v. Wade.
    Reed JW
    J Policy Hist; 1995; 7(1):22-52. PubMed ID: 12346344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adolescent contraception.
    Kreutner AK
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 1981 May; 28(2):455-73. PubMed ID: 7243372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.