These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35990365)

  • 1. RastrOS Project: Natural Language Processing contributions to the development of an eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms for Brazilian Portuguese.
    Leal SE; Lukasova K; Carthery-Goulart MT; Aluísio SM
    Lang Resour Eval; 2022; 56(4):1333-1372. PubMed ID: 35990365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):826-833. PubMed ID: 28523601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Beijing Sentence Corpus: A Chinese sentence corpus with eye movement data and predictability norms.
    Pan J; Yan M; Richter EM; Shu H; Kliegl R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1989-2000. PubMed ID: 34816386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sentence-final completion norms for 2925 Mexican Spanish sentence contexts.
    Angulo-Chavira AQ; Castellón-Flores AM; Ciria A; Arias-Trejo N
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2486-2498. PubMed ID: 37407787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Russian Sentence Corpus: Benchmark measures of eye movements in reading in Russian.
    Laurinavichyute AK; Sekerina IA; Alexeeva S; Bagdasaryan K; Kliegl R
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1161-1178. PubMed ID: 29907908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
    Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
    Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human and computer estimations of Predictability of words in written language.
    Bianchi B; Bengolea Monzón G; Ferrer L; Fernández Slezak D; Shalom DE; Kamienkowski JE
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4396. PubMed ID: 32157161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence contexts and cloze probabilities for Brazilian Portuguese children and adolescents.
    Rossi NF; Fernandes C; Moreira CS; Giacheti CM; Sichieri BB; Pinheiro AP; Sampaio A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236388. PubMed ID: 32730342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Flickr frequency norms: What 17 years of images tagged online tell us about lexical processing.
    Petilli MA; Günther F; Marelli M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):126-147. PubMed ID: 36509941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Brazilian Portuguese Lexicon: An Instrument for Psycholinguistic Research.
    Estivalet GL; Meunier F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144016. PubMed ID: 26630138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
    Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
    Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ZuCo, a simultaneous EEG and eye-tracking resource for natural sentence reading.
    Hollenstein N; Rotsztejn J; Troendle M; Pedroni A; Zhang C; Langer N
    Sci Data; 2018 Dec; 5():180291. PubMed ID: 30531985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data.
    de Varda AG; Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37880511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the Efficient Use of Word Embedding with Neural-Topic Models for Interpretable Topics from Short Texts.
    Murakami R; Chakraborty B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sentence-final word completion norms for European Portuguese children and adolescents.
    Pinheiro AP; Soares AP; Comesaña M; Niznikiewicz M; Gonçalves OF
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1022-9. PubMed ID: 21139169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading development at the text level: an investigation of surprisal and embeddingbased text similarity effects on eyemovements in Chinese early readers.
    Fan X; Reilly R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Sep; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 33828812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.