152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35992041)
1. Application of MRI and CT Images in Surgical Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer.
Lu A; Lu G
Scanning; 2022; 2022():1592449. PubMed ID: 35992041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer.
Ran C; Sun J; Qu Y; Long N
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 19(1):343. PubMed ID: 34886853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008217. PubMed ID: 23543561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Xiao M; Yan B; Li Y; Lu J; Qiang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 31776741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application of sentinel lymph node detection to early stage cervical cancer].
Zhang WJ; Zheng R; Wu LY; Li XG; Li B; Chen SZ
Ai Zheng; 2006 Feb; 25(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 16480592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative clinical utility of simultaneous
Gong J; Liu H; Bao Z; Bian L; Li X; Meng Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jun; 49(6):3000605211019190. PubMed ID: 34162259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can radicality of surgery be safely modulated on the basis of MRI and PET/CT imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative treatment?
Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Restaino G; Rufini V; Macchia G; Carbone A; Zannoni GF; Lucidi A; D'Angelo G; Scambia G
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 21720998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
