These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35993933)

  • 21. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface roughness of finished composite resins.
    Berastegui E; Canalda C; Brau E; Miquel C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):742-9. PubMed ID: 1331432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of various grit burs on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations.
    Nishimura K; Ikeda M; Yoshikawa T; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15868736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
    Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New finishing instruments for composite resins.
    Lutz F; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 107(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 6579090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finishing and polishing procedures of composite restorations by Saudi dentists: a cross-sectional study.
    Alqarni MA; Togoo RA; Al Shahrani I; Phani CR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):657-61. PubMed ID: 24309345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Tan S; Teh TY
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 10672147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Finishing Techniques on the Marginal Integrity of Resin-Based Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration.
    Delgado AJ; Ritter AV; Donovan TE; Ziemiecki T; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 26177046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish.
    Atabek D; Sillelioglu H; Olmez A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 20533638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.