These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35994751)

  • 1. Not All Effects Are Indispensable: Psychological Science Requires Verifiable Lines of Reasoning for Whether an Effect Matters.
    Anvari F; Kievit R; Lakens D; Pennington CR; Przybylski AK; Tiokhin L; Wiernik BM; Orben A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Mar; 18(2):503-507. PubMed ID: 35994751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-empirical support for eliminative reasoning.
    McCoy CD
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():15-29. PubMed ID: 34536852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Small Effects the Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science? A Reply to Götz et al. (2022).
    Primbs MA; Pennington CR; Lakens D; Silan MAA; Lieck DSN; Forscher PS; Buchanan EM; Westwood SJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Mar; 18(2):508-512. PubMed ID: 36126652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation.
    Hahn U
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 May; 24(5):363-374. PubMed ID: 32298622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Effects of Metaphor in a Dynamic Opinion Landscape.
    Thibodeau PH; Boroditsky L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133939. PubMed ID: 26218229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
    Mercier H; Sperber D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Apr; 34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. PubMed ID: 21447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why they shared: recovering early arguments for sharing social scientific data.
    Hauptmann E
    Sci Context; 2020 Jun; 33(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 33720006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Competence: Narrative Coherence or Practical Reasoning?
    Widdershoven G; Ruissen A; Meynen G
    AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(1):18-19. PubMed ID: 32009597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse.
    Osborne J
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):463-6. PubMed ID: 20413492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abductive reasoning in nursing: Challenges and possibilities.
    Karlsen B; Hillestad TM; Dysvik E
    Nurs Inq; 2021 Jan; 28(1):e12374. PubMed ID: 32691928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science communication as political communication.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13585-92. PubMed ID: 25225389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reflections on clinical judgment and the dimensional-categorical distinction in the study of personality disorders: Comment on Bornstein (2019).
    Lilienfeld SO
    Personal Disord; 2019 May; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 31070445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal theory error in college students' understanding of science studies.
    Seifert CM; Harrington M; Michal AL; Shah P
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jan; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 35022946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use.
    Osiurak F; Jarry C; Le Gall D
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):517-40. PubMed ID: 20438236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.