These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35996847)
1. Psychometric Evaluation of the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences-Therapist Version. She Z; Řiháček T; Xu J; Yang W; Xu D; Zhou N; Ji W; Xi J Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1651-1661. PubMed ID: 35996847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP) in Chinese lay clients and mental health professionals: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and scale differences. She Z; Xi J; Cooper M; Norcross JC; Di Malta G J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):436-447. PubMed ID: 36996165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences: Measurement invariance across international datasets and languages. Řiháček T; Cooper M; Cígler H; She Z; Di Malta G; Norcross JC Psychother Res; 2024 Jul; 34(6):804-816. PubMed ID: 37714114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A brief, multidimensional measure of clients' therapy preferences: The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP). Cooper M; Norcross JC Int J Clin Health Psychol; 2016; 16(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 30487853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Patient Preferences: Examination of the German Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences. Heinze PE; Weck F; Kühne F Front Psychol; 2021; 12():795776. PubMed ID: 35095681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chinese version of the international positive and negative affect schedule short form: factor structure and measurement invariance. Liu JD; You RH; Liu H; Chung PK Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Aug; 18(1):285. PubMed ID: 32838809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in psychotherapy preferences between psychotherapy trainees and laypeople. Heinze PE; Weck F; Hahn D; Kühne F Psychother Res; 2023 Mar; 33(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 35847994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The future disposition Inventory-24: reliability and validity estimates in a large sample of Chinese University students. Yuan L; Wang DF; Lew B; Osman A; Jia CX BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 18(1):299. PubMed ID: 30236111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers. Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Ecuadorian context: an evaluation of four models. Arias-Medina P BMC Psychol; 2019 Aug; 7(1):51. PubMed ID: 31387636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and evaluation of its measurement invariance across sex. Sun D; Chi L; Liu J; Liang J; Guo S; Li S Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Nov; 19(1):253. PubMed ID: 34743727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric evaluation of the traditional chinese version of PedsQL Huang YC; Chen YC; Gau BS; Wang JK; Chang SH; Yang HL Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):39. PubMed ID: 37147623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in French Canadian Young Adults. Doré I; O'Loughlin JL; Sabiston CM; Fournier L Can J Psychiatry; 2017 Apr; 62(4):286-294. PubMed ID: 28363262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0: short form is acceptable. Lin CY; Luh WM; Yang AL; Su CT; Wang JD; Ma HI Qual Life Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 21574017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Orientation Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Study on Chinese University Students. Chang J; Yong L; Yi Y; Liu X; Song H; Li Y; Yang M; Yao L; Song N Front Public Health; 2021; 9():574335. PubMed ID: 33968869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified? Santesson AHE; Bäckström M; Holmberg R; Perrin S; Jarbin H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):254. PubMed ID: 33054717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Therapist Response Questionnaire. Tanzilli A; Colli A; Del Corno F; Lingiardi V Personal Disord; 2016 Apr; 7(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 26389623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Matsudaira K; Kikuchi N; Murakami A; Isomura T J Orthop Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24091984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a modified Chinese version of the Caregiver Task Inventory--refinement and psychometric testing of the Chinese Caregiver Task Inventory: a confirmatory factor analysis. Lee RL; Mok ES J Clin Nurs; 2011 Dec; 20(23-24):3452-62. PubMed ID: 21707805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of social anxiety scale for social media users and cross-sectional investigation into this disorder among college students. Jia G; Dai H; Chu Y; Wang X; Hao Y; Wang S Compr Psychiatry; 2022 Jul; 116():152328. PubMed ID: 35623103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]