BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35997172)

  • 21. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Two Step LEEP and Cold Conisation For Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions to Decrease Positive Surgical Margins.
    Senol T; Polat M; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3317-20. PubMed ID: 27509969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
    Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
    MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
    Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized trial of the Fischer cone biopsy excisor and loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
    Boardman LA; Steinhoff MM; Shackelton R; Weitzen S; Crowthers L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 104(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 15458896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
    Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
    Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
    Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
    Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complications of laser conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure in pre- and postmenopausal patients.
    Kiuchi K; Hasegawa K; Motegi E; Kosaka N; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(6):803-808. PubMed ID: 29943925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.
    Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk factors for recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in patients with positive margins.
    Oh SH; Lee KB; Shin JW; Lee SH
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Aug; 49(8):2102-2108. PubMed ID: 37277146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
    Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
    Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
    An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
    Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.