BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35999143)

  • 1. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a new prognostic stratification for duodenal adenocarcinoma with that of TNM staging: The importance of T status with regard to the prognosis.
    Kato T; Ono Y; Oba A; Sato T; Ito H; Inoue Y; Saiura A; Takahashi Y
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 35999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
    Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
    Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
    Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Matsumoto T; Okabayashi T; Sui K; Kimura J; Morita S; Iwata J; Iiyama T; Kubota K; Shimada Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):667-677. PubMed ID: 33855599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
    Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
    Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
    Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
    Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High tumor budding predicts a poor prognosis in resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.
    Sakaguchi T; Satoi S; Hashimoto D; Yamamoto T; Yamaki S; Hirooka S; Ishida M; Ikeura T; Inoue K; Naganuma M; Ishikawa H; Sekimoto M
    Surg Today; 2022 Jun; 52(6):931-940. PubMed ID: 34988677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
    Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extent of regional lymphadenectomy and number-based nodal classification for non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
    Abe S; Sakata J; Hirose Y; Nomura T; Takano K; Kitami C; Yokoyama N; Aono T; Minagawa M; Tsukahara A; Ohashi T; Takizawa K; Miura K; Ichikawa H; Shimada Y; Kobayashi T; Wakai T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 49(12):107122. PubMed ID: 37897834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Schlitter AM; Jesinghaus M; Jäger C; Konukiewitz B; Muckenhuber A; Demir IE; Bahra M; Denkert C; Friess H; Kloeppel G; Ceyhan GO; Weichert W
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():121-129. PubMed ID: 28802189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy? A comparison of survival between the 8th and 7th editions of the AJCC TNM staging system for stage IB patients.
    Wang J; Wu N; Lv C; Yan S; Yang Y
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 145(2):463-469. PubMed ID: 30474757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.
    Chae S; Lee A; Lee JH
    Gastric Cancer; 2011 Jun; 14(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 21360132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.
    Lu J; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX
    Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 22(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 23787074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative-intent resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A matched cohort study.
    Ecker BL; McMillan MT; Datta J; Dempsey DT; Karakousis GC; Fraker DL; Drebin JA; Mamtani R; Giantonio BJ; Roses RE
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Dec; 69():135-141. PubMed ID: 27821316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation on the prognosis of pathological stage II-IIIA (8th edition TNM classification) primary lung cancer after curative surgery.
    Isaka T; Ito H; Nakayama H; Yokose T; Saito H; Adachi H; Miura J; Shigefuku S; Kikuchi A; Rino Y
    Lung Cancer; 2021 Dec; 162():128-134. PubMed ID: 34775216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer].
    Zhang P; Xu Y; Guo J; Xu H
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25975787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcomes in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma.
    Lee SY; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC; Park KM; Lee YJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Dec; 84(12):970-5. PubMed ID: 23656271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
    Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.