479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3600005)
1. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Apr; 95(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 3352301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-year clinical results with the Monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D; Lindblom U; Henze A; Björk VO; Semb BK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 3600006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term clinical results after mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Feb; 95(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3339899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of aortic valve replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses.
Perier P; Bessou JP; Swanson JS; Bensasson D; Chachques JC; Chauvaud S; Deloche A; Fabiani JN; Blondeau P; d'Allaines C
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II140-5. PubMed ID: 4028358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valve replacement in children under twenty years of age. Experience with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Iyer KS; Reddy KS; Rao IM; Venugopal P; Bhatia ML; Gopinath N
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 6748715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis. Analysis of long-term evolution.
Alvarez L; Escudero C; Figuera D; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Nov; 104(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 1434701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
