These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36001925)
1. Comparison between wrap around screens and a head mounted display on driver muscle and kinematic responses to a pedestrian hazard. Filio D; Ziraldo E; Dony L; Gonzalez D; Oliver M Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103878. PubMed ID: 36001925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the use of a head mounted display increase the success of risk awareness and perception training (RAPT) for drivers? Madigan R; Romano R Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103076. PubMed ID: 32174364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Street-Crossing Behavior: Comparing a CAVE Simulator and a Head-Mounted Display among Younger and Older Adults. Pala P; Cavallo V; Dang NT; Granié MA; Schneider S; Maruhn P; Bengler K Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106004. PubMed ID: 33540347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hazard Perception, Presence, and Simulation Sickness-A Comparison of Desktop and Head-Mounted Display for Driving Simulation. Malone S; Brünken R Front Psychol; 2021; 12():647723. PubMed ID: 33967907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pedestrian Crossing Decisions in Virtual Environments: Behavioral Validity in CAVEs and Head-Mounted Displays. Schneider S; Maruhn P; Dang NT; Pala P; Cavallo V; Bengler K Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 33529060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment. Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Naturalistic visualization of reaching movements using head-mounted displays improves movement quality compared to conventional computer screens and proves high usability. Wenk N; Buetler KA; Penalver-Andres J; Müri RM; Marchal-Crespo L J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 36494668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer. Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Who goes first? A distributed simulator study of vehicle-pedestrian interaction. Kalantari AH; Yang Y; Garcia de Pedro J; Lee YM; Horrobin A; Solernou A; Holmes C; Merat N; Markkula G Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107050. PubMed ID: 37023651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of augmented reality warnings on driving behaviour whilst approaching pedestrian crossings: A driving simulator study. Calvi A; D'Amico F; Ferrante C; Bianchini Ciampoli L Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105760. PubMed ID: 32932209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial presence depends on 'coupling' between body sway and visual motion presented on head-mounted displays (HMDs). Chowdhury NS; Luu W; Palmisano S; Ujike H; Kim J Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103355. PubMed ID: 33444884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist. Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head mounted displays for capturing head kinematics in postural tasks. Lubetzky AV; Wang Z; Krasovsky T J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 86():175-182. PubMed ID: 30797562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction in a mixed-street environment using a driving simulator. Obeid H; Abkarian H; Abou-Zeid M; Kaysi I Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():56-65. PubMed ID: 28846880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of driver compensatory behaviour on risks of critical pedestrian collisions under simulated visual field defects. Lee J; Itoh M PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231130. PubMed ID: 32271822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using virtual reality driving simulators in persons with spinal cord injury: three screen display versus head mounted display. Carlozzi NE; Gade V; Rizzo AS; Tulsky DS Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 22775982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-mounted displays for clinical virtual reality applications: pitfalls in understanding user behavior while using technology. Simone LK; Schultheis MT; Rebimbas J; Millis SR Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Oct; 9(5):591-602. PubMed ID: 17034327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of visual fatigue caused by head-mounted display for virtual reality and two-dimensional display using objective and subjective evaluation. Hirota M; Kanda H; Endo T; Miyoshi T; Miyagawa S; Hirohara Y; Yamaguchi T; Saika M; Morimoto T; Fujikado T Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 30773103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Omnidirectional Virtual Visual Acuity: A User-Centric Visual Clarity Metric for Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays and Environments. Wang J; Shi R; Li X; Wei Y; Liang HN IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 May; 30(5):2033-2043. PubMed ID: 38437113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of full windshield head-up display on visual attention allocation. Zhang Y; Yang T; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Sun Y Ergonomics; 2021 Oct; 64(10):1310-1321. PubMed ID: 33840367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]