BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36002852)

  • 1. Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.
    Thusini S; Milenova M; Nahabedian N; Grey B; Soukup T; Henderson C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Aug; 22(1):1083. PubMed ID: 36002852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review.
    Thusini S; Milenova M; Nahabedian N; Grey B; Soukup T; Chua KC; Henderson C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1492. PubMed ID: 36476622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study.
    Thusini S; Soukup T; Chua KC; Henderson C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Sep; 23(1):1009. PubMed ID: 37726753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.
    Mery G; Dobrow MJ; Baker GR; Im J; Brown A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e012431. PubMed ID: 28219957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs.
    Baxter S; Sanderson K; Venn AJ; Blizzard CL; Palmer AJ
    Am J Health Promot; 2014; 28(6):347-63. PubMed ID: 24977496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lessons Learned From Measuring Return on Investment in Public Health Quality Improvement Initiatives.
    Crawley-Stout LA; Ward KA; See CH; Randolph G
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(2):E28-37. PubMed ID: 25723876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Board Level Intervention to Develop Organisation-Wide Quality Improvement Strategies: Cost-Consequences Analysis in 15 Healthcare Organisations.
    Barbosa EC; Jones L; Pomeroy L; Robert G; Burnett S; Anderson JE; Morris S; Naomi F
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 32610820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments.
    Chen LW; Wilson FA; Gregg A; Gupta N; Bekmuratova S; Palm D
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 28257401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.
    O'Flaherty M; Lloyd-Williams F; Capewell S; Boland A; Maden M; Collins B; Bandosz P; Hyseni L; Kypridemos C
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(35):1-234. PubMed ID: 34076574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Provider Regimes in the English NHS: A Rapid Evaluation of a National Improvement Initiative for Failing Healthcare Organisations.
    Vindrola-Padros C; Ledger J; Hill M; Tomini S; Spencer J; Fulop NJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(12):2917-2926. PubMed ID: 35490260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.
    Tappenden P; Campbell F; Rawdin A; Wong R; Kalita N
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(20):1-72. PubMed ID: 22490205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Building the business case for quality improvement: a framework for evaluating return on investment.
    Shah A; Course S
    Future Healthc J; 2018 Jun; 5(2):132-137. PubMed ID: 31098548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
    Husk K; Lovell R; Cooper C; Stahl-Timmins W; Garside R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD010351. PubMed ID: 27207731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.
    Whitaker R; Hendry M; Aslam R; Booth A; Carter B; Charles JM; Craine N; Tudor Edwards R; Noyes J; Ives Ntambwe L; Pasterfield D; Rycroft-Malone J; Williams N
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(16):1-214. PubMed ID: 26931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An economic evaluation of the All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement Registry programme-subanalyses for Māori (ANZACS-QI 42).
    Lee P; Zomer E; Liew D
    N Z Med J; 2020 May; 133(1514):16-32. PubMed ID: 32379736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Lawrenson JG; Graham-Rowe E; Lorencatto F; Burr J; Bunce C; Francis JJ; Aluko P; Rice S; Vale L; Peto T; Presseau J; Ivers N; Grimshaw JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD012054. PubMed ID: 29333660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating costs of quality improvement for outpatient healthcare organisations: a practical methodology.
    Brown SE; Chin MH; Huang ES
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2007 Aug; 16(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 17693669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.