204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36003148)
41. CD49b identifies functionally and epigenetically distinct subsets of lineage-biased hematopoietic stem cells.
Somuncular E; Hauenstein J; Khalkar P; Johansson AS; Dumral Ö; Frengen NS; Gustafsson C; Mocci G; Su TY; Brouwer H; Trautmann CL; Vanlandewijck M; Orkin SH; Månsson R; Luc S
Stem Cell Reports; 2022 Jul; 17(7):1546-1560. PubMed ID: 35714596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Human induced pluripotent stem cells from two azoospermic patients with Klinefelter syndrome show similar X chromosome inactivation behavior to female pluripotent stem cells.
Panula S; Kurek M; Kumar P; Albalushi H; Padrell Sánchez S; Damdimopoulou P; Olofsson JI; Hovatta O; Lanner F; Stukenborg JB
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2297-2310. PubMed ID: 31743397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Contribution of genetic and epigenetic changes to escape from X-chromosome inactivation.
Balaton BP; Brown CJ
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2021 Jun; 14(1):30. PubMed ID: 34187555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones.
Xue F; Tian XC; Du F; Kubota C; Taneja M; Dinnyes A; Dai Y; Levine H; Pereira LV; Yang X
Nat Genet; 2002 Jun; 31(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 12032569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations.
Shen Y; Matsuno Y; Fouse SD; Rao N; Root S; Xu R; Pellegrini M; Riggs AD; Fan G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Mar; 105(12):4709-14. PubMed ID: 18339804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Meta-analysis of the heterogeneity of X chromosome inactivation in human pluripotent stem cells.
Bruck T; Benvenisty N
Stem Cell Res; 2011 Mar; 6(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 21276761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Developmental fate of hematopoietic stem cells: the study of individual hematopoietic clones at the level of antigen-responsive B lymphocytes.
Olovnikova NI; Drize NJ; Ershler MA; Nifontova IN; Belkina EV; Nikolaeva TN; Proskurina NV; Chertkov JL
Hematol J; 2003; 4(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 12750734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Myeloid-biased hematopoietic stem cells have extensive self-renewal capacity but generate diminished lymphoid progeny with impaired IL-7 responsiveness.
Muller-Sieburg CE; Cho RH; Karlsson L; Huang JF; Sieburg HB
Blood; 2004 Jun; 103(11):4111-8. PubMed ID: 14976059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Transcriptome-wide survey of mouse CNS-derived cells reveals monoallelic expression within novel gene families.
Li SM; Valo Z; Wang J; Gao H; Bowers CW; Singer-Sam J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31751. PubMed ID: 22384067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cytokine combinations on the potential for ex vivo expansion of murine hematopoietic stem cells.
Lui WC; Chan YF; Chan LC; Ng RK
Cytokine; 2014 Aug; 68(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24825677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. High-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis of early-stage human embryonic stem cells reveals an association between X chromosome instability and skewed X inactivation.
Luo Y; Li J; Zhu D; Fan Y; Li S; Sun X
Cell Biosci; 2014; 4(1):74. PubMed ID: 25506417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Overcoming Autocrine FGF Signaling-Induced Heterogeneity in Naive Human ESCs Enables Modeling of Random X Chromosome Inactivation.
An C; Feng G; Zhang J; Cao S; Wang Y; Wang N; Lu F; Zhou Q; Wang H
Cell Stem Cell; 2020 Sep; 27(3):482-497.e4. PubMed ID: 32673569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Donor-to-Donor Heterogeneity in the Clonal Dynamics of Transplanted Human Cord Blood Stem Cells in Murine Xenografts.
Belderbos ME; Jacobs S; Koster TK; Ausema A; Weersing E; Zwart E; de Haan G; Bystrykh LV
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2020 Jan; 26(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 31494231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Variations of X chromosome inactivation occur in early passages of female human embryonic stem cells.
Dvash T; Lavon N; Fan G
PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e11330. PubMed ID: 20593031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Random monoallelic expression: regulating gene expression one allele at a time.
Eckersley-Maslin MA; Spector DL
Trends Genet; 2014 Jun; 30(6):237-44. PubMed ID: 24780084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Extreme clonality in lymphoblastoid cell lines with implications for allele specific expression analyses.
Plagnol V; Uz E; Wallace C; Stevens H; Clayton D; Ozcelik T; Todd JA
PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2966. PubMed ID: 18698422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Differences in Cell Cycle Status Underlie Transcriptional Heterogeneity in the HSC Compartment.
Lauridsen FKB; Jensen TL; Rapin N; Aslan D; Wilhelmson AS; Pundhir S; Rehn M; Paul F; Giladi A; Hasemann MS; Serup P; Amit I; Porse BT
Cell Rep; 2018 Jul; 24(3):766-780. PubMed ID: 30021172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. mTOR Signaling as a Regulator of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Fate.
Fernandes H; Moura J; Carvalho E
Stem Cell Rev Rep; 2021 Aug; 17(4):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 33586059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Differentiation-based model of hematopoietic stem cell functions and lineage pathways.
Höfer T; Rodewald HR
Blood; 2018 Sep; 132(11):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 30042097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Stochastic choice of allelic expression in human neural stem cells.
Jeffries AR; Perfect LW; Ledderose J; Schalkwyk LC; Bray NJ; Mill J; Price J
Stem Cells; 2012 Sep; 30(9):1938-47. PubMed ID: 22714879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
