These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3600529)
1. Megavoltage portal films using computed radiographic imaging with photostimulable phosphors. Wilenzick RM; Merritt CR; Balter S Med Phys; 1987; 14(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 3600529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital imaging of the chest. Merritt CR; Matthews CC; Scheinhorn D; Balter S J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 3916446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging. Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system. Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital luminescence radiography. A new method of study in thoracic diagnosis at the intensive care unit]. Witte G; Pothmann W; Bause H; Nicolas V; Schulte am Esch J; Bücheler E Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2653089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study]. Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality. Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8164588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Fujita H; Ueda K; Morishita J; Fujikawa T; Ohtsuka A; Sai T Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 2921980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose. Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of analog contrast enhancement and digital unsharp masking in low-contrast portal images. Weiser JC; Gur D; Gennari RC; Deutsch M Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 2308541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device. Samant SS; Gopal A Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Irradiation field controls by digital luminescence radiography]. John V; Müller RD; Feldmann HJ; Oezgür B; Budach V Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 May; 168(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 1598664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The new possibilities of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and digital imaging data processing for the making of field verification images]. Zimmermann JS; Blume J; Wendhausen H; Hebbinghaus D; Kovács G; Eilf K; Schultze J; Kimmig BN Strahlenther Onkol; 1995 Jun; 171(6):332-9. PubMed ID: 7597619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography. MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system. Tsalafoutas IA; Blastaris GA; Moutsatsos AS; Chios PS; Efstathopoulos EP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 18245792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]