These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36005454)

  • 1. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
    Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
    J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
    Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
    Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Radiation Exposure of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Clinical Follow-Up Setting.
    Opitz M; Zensen S; Breuckmann K; Bos D; Forsting M; Hoffmann O; Stuschke M; Wetter A; Guberina N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric evaluation of the mean glandular dose for mammography in Korean women: a preliminary report.
    Oh KK; Hur J; Kim EK; Choo SS
    Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 14584104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.
    Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah SA
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 32495513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
    Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China.
    Du X; Wang J; Yang CY; Zhou XF; Chen W; Cao XJ; Zhou YY; Le Yu N
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2014 May; 27(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 24827723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
    Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Mammography in Dubai.
    Abdulwahid Noor K; Mohd Norsuddin N; Abdul Karim MK; Che Isa IN; Alshamsi W
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38201317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period.
    Ramnarain J; Cartwright L; Diffey J
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 38019445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.