201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36006428)
101. Correlations between maximum standardized uptake value measured via
Li H; Wang X; Zhang L; Yi X; Qiao Y; Jin Q
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(7):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 31939441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. Prognostic significance of
Lee JW; Choi JS; Lyu J; Lee SM
Lung Cancer; 2018 Apr; 118():41-47. PubMed ID: 29572001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. Prognostic Value of
Albano D; Camoni L; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2020 Nov; 20(11):e897-e904. PubMed ID: 32703751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
104. Prognostic role of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in elderly HL: a two-center experience in 123 patients.
Albano D; Mazzoletti A; Spallino M; Muzi C; Zilioli VR; Pagani C; Tucci A; Rossetti C; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Ann Hematol; 2020 Jun; 99(6):1321-1330. PubMed ID: 32333153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. Intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity of gastric cancer on
Liu G; Yin H; Cheng X; Wang Y; Hu Y; Liu T; Shi H
Clin Exp Med; 2021 Feb; 21(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 32880779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
106. Stacking Ensemble Learning-Based [
Zhao S; Wang J; Jin C; Zhang X; Xue C; Zhou R; Zhong Y; Liu Y; He X; Zhou Y; Xu C; Zhang L; Qian W; Zhang H; Zhang X; Tian M
J Nucl Med; 2023 Oct; 64(10):1603-1609. PubMed ID: 37500261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Combined prognostic role of TARC and interim
Husi K; Pinczés LI; Fejes Z; Nagy B; Illés Á; Miltényi Z
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 35913858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. A common [18F]-FDG PET radiomic signature to predict survival in patients with HPV-induced cancers.
Niyoteka S; Seban RD; Rouhi R; Scarsbrook A; Genestie C; Classe M; Carré A; Sun R; La Greca Saint-Esteven A; Chargari C; McKenna J; McDermott G; Malinen E; Tanadini-Lang S; Guckenberger M; Guren MG; Lemanski C; Deutsch E; Robert C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Nov; 50(13):4010-4023. PubMed ID: 37632562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. Can FDG PET predict radiation treatment outcome in head and neck cancer? Results of a prospective study.
Schinagl DA; Span PN; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1449-58. PubMed ID: 21461734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. Significance of CT attenuation and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of visceral adipose tissue for predicting survival in gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection.
Lee JW; Son MW; Chung IK; Cho YS; Lee MS; Lee SM
Gastric Cancer; 2020 Mar; 23(2):273-284. PubMed ID: 31485803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
111. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112.
Parvez A; Tau N; Hussey D; Maganti M; Metser U
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 32(6):410-416. PubMed ID: 29754276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
113. Chemotherapy Response Assessment by FDG-PET-CT in Early-stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Moving Beyond the Five-Point Deauville Score.
Milgrom SA; Dong W; Akhtari M; Smith GL; Pinnix CC; Mawlawi O; Rohren E; Garg N; Chuang H; Yehia ZA; Reddy JP; Gunther JR; Khoury JD; Suki T; Osborne EM; Oki Y; Fanale M; Dabaja BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):333-338. PubMed ID: 28068241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
114. A hybrid few-shot multiple-instance learning model predicting the aggressiveness of lymphoma in PET/CT images.
Xu C; Feng J; Yue Y; Cheng W; He D; Qi S; Zhang G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jan; 243():107872. PubMed ID: 37922655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
115. Evaluation of the prognostic value of different methods of calculating the tumour metabolic volume with
Guzmán Ortiz S; Mucientes Rasilla J; Vargas Núñez JA; Royuela A; Navarro Matilla B; Mitjavila Casanovas M
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(6):340-346. PubMed ID: 32646783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Increased Prostate Cancer Glucose Metabolism Detected by
Lavallée E; Bergeron M; Buteau FA; Blouin AC; Duchesnay N; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Lacombe L; Fradet V; Makao-Nguile M; Fradet Y; Beauregard JM; Pouliot F
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):998-1006. PubMed ID: 29609897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
117. Validation of a Multifocal Segmentation Method for Measuring Metabolic Tumor Volume in Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Camacho MR; Etchebehere E; Tardelli N; Delamain MT; Vercosa AFA; Takahashi MES; Brunetto SQ; Metze IGHL; Souza CA; Cerci JJ; Ramos CD
J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Mar; 48(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 31604902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
118. Prognostic model using 18F-FDG PET radiomics predicts progression-free survival in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Driessen J; Zwezerijnen GJC; Schöder H; Kersten MJ; Moskowitz AJ; Moskowitz CH; Eertink JJ; Heymans MW; Boellaard R; Zijlstra JM
Blood Adv; 2023 Nov; 7(21):6732-6743. PubMed ID: 37722357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
119. [The correlation between metabolic parameters in (18)F-FDG PET-CT and solid and micropapillary histological subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma].
Guo Y; Yao ZM; Chen M; Chen CX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):555-561. PubMed ID: 35754230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
120. Bone marrow 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography cannot replace bone marrow biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; Fijnheer R; Dubois SV; Nievelstein RA; de Klerk JM
Am J Hematol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):726-31. PubMed ID: 24711255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
