These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36006719)

  • 21. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linking the dynamics of cognitive control to individual differences in working memory capacity: Evidence from reaching behavior.
    Erb CD; Welhaf MS; Smeekens BA; Moreau D; Kane MJ; Marcovitch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1383-1402. PubMed ID: 34197169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 35426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
    Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Chee AE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):170-89. PubMed ID: 20053053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
    Broadway JM; Engle RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43101. PubMed ID: 22952636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.
    Blumen HM; Stern Y
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 21264617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions.
    Saraiva M; Garrido MV; Albuquerque PB
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 32789597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in working memory capacity moderate effects of post-learning activity on memory consolidation over the long term.
    Martini M; Marhenke R; Martini C; Rossi S; Sachse P
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17976. PubMed ID: 33087750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity.
    Tse CS; Pu X
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 22774786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
    Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering.
    Soemer A; Schiefele U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):758-767. PubMed ID: 32333324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 21736433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Romantic partners' working memory capacity facilitates relationship problem resolution through recollection of problem-relevant information.
    Baker LR; Kane MJ; Russell VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 31318255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.