These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36006719)

  • 41. Romantic partners' working memory capacity facilitates relationship problem resolution through recollection of problem-relevant information.
    Baker LR; Kane MJ; Russell VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 31318255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.
    Weldon MS; Bellinger KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1160-1175. PubMed ID: 9293627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Individual differences in working memory capacity, attention control, fluid intelligence, and pupillary measures of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1296-1310. PubMed ID: 35389696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Aiding the search: Examining individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving.
    Ellis DM; Brewer GA
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Jul; 62():21-33. PubMed ID: 29723709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach.
    Marevic I; Arnold NR; Rummel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 28326968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.
    Conte N; Pelegrina S; Padulo C; Marascia E; Fairfield B
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 38466389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Individual differences in contextual storage: evidence from the list-strength effect.
    Sahakyan L; Abushanab B; Smith JR; Gray KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 24294917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Spataro P; Bhatia D; Doricchi F; Mastroberardino S; Cestari V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():102986. PubMed ID: 31887634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.
    Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):837-49. PubMed ID: 19679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity.
    Foster JL; Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Hicks KL; Redick TS; Engle RW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 25217113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does collaborative remembering reduce false memories?
    Takahashi M
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):1-13. PubMed ID: 17319047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Once established, goal reminders provide long-lasting and cumulative benefits for lower working memory capacity individuals.
    Hood AVB; Charbonneau B; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1738-1753. PubMed ID: 36201799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: evidence from accuracy and eye movements.
    Mall JT; Morey CC; Wolff MJ; Lehnert F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1998-2014. PubMed ID: 24402698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Benefits and Detriments of Social Collaborative Memory in Turn-Taking and Directed Forgetting.
    Nie A; Guo B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Jun; 130(3):1040-1076. PubMed ID: 36988341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories.
    Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2411-25. PubMed ID: 23679085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure.
    Nie A; Ke C; Li M; Guo B
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2019; 15(4):276-289. PubMed ID: 32494313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Working memory capacity, controlled attention and aiming performance under pressure.
    Wood G; Vine SJ; Wilson MR
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):510-7. PubMed ID: 26021749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.