These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36006725)
1. Who is sensitive to selection biases in inductive reasoning? Hayes BK; Liew SX; Connor Desai S; Navarro DJ; Wen Y J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):284-300. PubMed ID: 36006725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective sampling and inductive inference: Drawing inferences based on observed and missing evidence. Hayes BK; Banner S; Forrester S; Navarro DJ Cogn Psychol; 2019 Sep; 113():101221. PubMed ID: 31200210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing your mind about the data: Updating sampling assumptions in inductive inference. Hayes BK; Pham J; Lee J; Perfors A; Ransom K; Desai SC Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105717. PubMed ID: 38241825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Negative evidence and inductive reasoning in generalization of associative learning. Lee JC; Lovibond PF; Hayes BK; Navarro DJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):289-303. PubMed ID: 30475021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adding Types, But Not Tokens, Affects Property Induction. Xie B; Navarro DJ; Hayes BK Cogn Sci; 2020 Sep; 44(9):e12895. PubMed ID: 32939797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Gweon H; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 May; 107(20):9066-71. PubMed ID: 20435914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diversity effect in inductive reasoning depends on sampling assumptions. Hayes BK; Navarro DJ; Stephens RG; Ransom K; Dilevski N Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 30684248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From features to categories: The development of inductive generalization. Ralston RW; Sloutsky VM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1615-1634. PubMed ID: 37307326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The contrast diversity effect: Increasing the diversity of contrast examples increases generalization from a single item. Kalkstein DA; Bosch DA; Kleiman T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):296-315. PubMed ID: 31081653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What do our sampling assumptions affect: How we encode data or how we reason from it? Ransom KJ; Perfors A; Hayes BK; Connor Desai S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1419-1438. PubMed ID: 36048051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process. Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relational reasoning and generalization using nonsymbolic neural networks. Geiger A; Carstensen A; Frank MC; Potts C Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):308-333. PubMed ID: 35834185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dynamic model of reasoning and memory. Hawkins GE; Hayes BK; Heit E J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):155-180. PubMed ID: 26569129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analogical and category-based inference: a theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models. Holyoak KJ; Lee HS; Lu H J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):702-27. PubMed ID: 21038985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A theory of learning to infer. Dasgupta I; Schulz E; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ Psychol Rev; 2020 Apr; 127(3):412-441. PubMed ID: 32223286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]