These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36007801)
1. How to resolve inconclusive predictions from defined approaches for skin sensitisation in OECD Guideline No. 497. Macmillan DS; Chilton ML; Gao Y; Kern PS; Schneider SN Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Nov; 135():105248. PubMed ID: 36007801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products. Strickland J; Truax J; Corvaro M; Settivari R; Henriquez J; McFadden J; Gulledge T; Johnson V; Gehen S; Germolec D; Allen DG; Kleinstreuer N Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():852856. PubMed ID: 35586187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays. Macmillan DS; Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Williams RV; Barber CG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():30-8. PubMed ID: 26796566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus of classification trees for skin sensitisation hazard prediction. Asturiol D; Casati S; Worth A Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():197-209. PubMed ID: 27458072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data. Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated skin sensitization assessment based on OECD methods (II): Hazard and potency by combining kinetic peptide reactivity and the "2 out of 3" Defined Approach. Natsch A; Gerberick GF ALTEX; 2022; 39(4):647-655. PubMed ID: 35404468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A defined approach for predicting skin sensitisation hazard and potency based on the guided integration of in silico, in chemico and in vitro data using exclusion criteria. Macmillan DS; Chilton ML Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Feb; 101():35-47. PubMed ID: 30439387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds. Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an in silico evaluation system that quantitatively predicts skin sensitization using OECD Guideline No. 497 ITSv2 defined approach for skin sensitization classification. Asai T; Umeshita K; Sakurai M; Sakane S Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 185():114444. PubMed ID: 38253282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The activity of methacrylate esters in skin sensitisation test methods II. A review of complementary and additional analyses. Kimber I Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 119():104821. PubMed ID: 33186628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated? Roberts DW; Patlewicz G J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard. Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431. Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J; Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation - scope and limitations. Roberts DW Crit Rev Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 52(6):420-430. PubMed ID: 36542542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a defined approach for eye hazard identification of solid chemicals according to the three UN GHS categories. Alépée N; Adriaens E ALTEX; 2024; 41(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 38760936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients. Cho SA; Choi M; Park SR; An S; Park JH J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):300-312. PubMed ID: 31680285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction. Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ahuja V; Adiga Perdur G; Aj Z; Krishnappa M; Kandarova H Altern Lab Anim; 2024 Jul; 52(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 38910363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation hazard identification and risk assessment. Gerberick GF Altern Lab Anim; 2016 Oct; 44(5):437-442. PubMed ID: 27805826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]