133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36008184)
1. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of colposcopic impression based on a single image versus a two-minute time series of colposcopic images.
Perkins R; Jeronimo J; Hammer A; Novetsky A; Guido R; Del Pino M; Louwers J; Marcus J; Resende C; Smith K; Egemen D; Befano B; Smith D; Antani S; de Sanjose S; Schiffman M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 36008184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement on Lesion Presence and Location at Colposcopy.
Lycke KD; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Jeronimo J; de Sanjose S; Egemen D; Del Pino M; Marcus J; Schiffman M; Hammer A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2024 Jan; 28(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 37963327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images.
Liu AH; Gold MA; Schiffman M; Smith KM; Zuna RE; Dunn ST; Gage JC; Walker JL; Wentzensen N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Apr; 20(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 27015261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression.
Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of human papillomavirus genotype on colposcopic appearance: a cross-sectional analysis.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Quint WG; Berkhof J; del Pino M; Torné A; Ordi J; Wentzensen N; Schiffman M; van de Sandt MM; Lindeman J; Jenkins D; Helmerhorst TJ; Verheijen RH; ter Harmsel B; Alonso I
BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1117-26. PubMed ID: 24494663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 15592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy.
Zaal A; Louwers JA; Berkhof J; Kocken M; Ter Harmsel WA; Graziosi GC; Spruijt JW; Balas C; Papagiannakis E; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ; Verheijen RH
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 22304443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Katki HA; Schiffman M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19550210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence in colposcopic examination: A promising tool to assist junior colposcopists.
Wu A; Xue P; Abulizi G; Tuerxun D; Rezhake R; Qiao Y
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1060451. PubMed ID: 37056736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized colposcopy: results of a pilot study and analysis of its clinical relevance.
Cristoforoni PM; Gerbaldo D; Perino A; Piccoli R; Montz FJ; Capitanio GL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 7770246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and diagnostic performance of smartphone colposcopy.
Aydın S; Karasu AFG; Maraşlı M; Bademler N; Kıran G; Dural HR
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 155(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 33630304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GRAND: A large-scale dataset and benchmark for cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia grading with fine-grained lesion description.
Li Y; Liu ZH; Xue P; Chen J; Ma K; Qian T; Zheng Y; Qiao YL
Med Image Anal; 2021 May; 70():102006. PubMed ID: 33690025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of colposcopy in the Swedish screening program.
Alfonzo E; Zhang C; Daneshpip F; Strander B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):549-555. PubMed ID: 36879505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical determinants of a positive visual inspection after treatment with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening.
Castle PE; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Chen W; Valdez M; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Jeronimo J
BJOG; 2014 May; 121(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 24575872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving colposcopic accuracy for cervical precancer detection: a retrospective multicenter study in China.
Wei B; Zhang B; Xue P; Seery S; Wang J; Li Q; Jiang Y; Qiao Y
BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):388. PubMed ID: 35399061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colposcopic evaluation of pre-invasive and early cervical carcinoma with histologic correlation.
Shahida SM; Mirza TT; Saleh AF; Islam MA
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Apr; 21(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22561759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
