175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36008285)
1. [Prediction and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum].
Wang LL; Yang HX; Chen JY; Fan LX; Zhang XX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 57(8):587-593. PubMed ID: 36008285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum.
Cheng XY; Cheng L; Li WJ; Qian LH; Zhang YQ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 May; 141(2):212-216. PubMed ID: 29341106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.
Chueh HY; Pai AH; Su YY; Hsu CC; Chang FY; Yen CF
Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 35219475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis on clinical association of uterine scar diverticulum with subsequent infertility in patients underwent cesarean section.
Bi B; Gao S; Ruan F; Shi Y; Jiang Y; Liu S; Lv W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(41):e27531. PubMed ID: 34731147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive outcomes following abdominal repair for cesarean scar defect in women who desire subsequent pregnancies: A single-center retrospective study.
Ishikawa H; Saito Y; Koga K; Shozu M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():141-147. PubMed ID: 37871351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric and Gynecologic Outcomes after the Transvaginal Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect in a Series of 183 Women.
Deng K; Liu W; Chen Y; Lin S; Huang X; Wu C; Wang H; Wang J; Chen L; Liu X; Zheng Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 33326862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in parturients with previous scar in labor: a cross-sectional study.
Alalaf SK; Mansour TMM; Sileem SA; Shabila NP
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35568830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Current status of uterine rupture: a multi-center survey in China].
Liu Z; Yang HX; Xin H; Cui SH; Qi HB; Zhang WS
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 31262119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel laparoscopic surgery for the repair of cesarean scar defect without processing scar resection.
Zhang NN; Wang GW; Zuo N; Yang Q
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):815. PubMed ID: 34879840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of Scar Myometrium Thickness and Previous Cesarean Scar Defect Using the Three-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasound.
Shi L; Du K
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():3584572. PubMed ID: 36262982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Change of the residual myometrial thickness during pregnancy in women who underwent laparoscopic niche resection compared with controls without niche surgery: a prospective comparative cohort study.
Jordans IPM; Vissers J; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; Twisk JWR; de Groot CJM; Huirne JAF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):901.e1-901.e12. PubMed ID: 35841936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula Diagnosed in Non-pregnant Women.
Chen H; Wang H; Zhou J; Xiong Y; Wang X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):526-534. PubMed ID: 29944931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Features, Management and Maternal-Infant Prognosis in Patients with Complete Uterine Rupture in the Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy.
Xu H; Wang G; Li Q; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Wu Y
Altern Ther Health Med; 2022 Sep; 28(6):82-87. PubMed ID: 35687703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
