These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36009844)

  • 1. Behavioural Responses of Defended and Undefended Prey to Their Predator-A Case Study of Rotifera.
    Parry V; Schlägel UE; Tiedemann R; Weithoff G
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 36009844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The adaptive value of cyclomorphic spine production in Brachionus calyciflorus pallas (rotatoria) : I. Predator-prey relationships in short term experiments].
    Halbach U
    Oecologia; 1971 Sep; 6(3):267-288. PubMed ID: 28310974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prey (Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus havanaensis) exposed to heavy metals (Cu and Cd) for different durations and concentrations affect predator's (Asplanchna brightwellii) population growth.
    Gama-Flores JL; Ferrara-Guerrero Mde J; Sarma SS; Nandini S
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Aug; 42(10):1483-8. PubMed ID: 17680489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactive effects of algal level and predator density (Asplanchna sieboldi) on the life-history strategy and morphology of Brachionus calyciflorus.
    Pan L; Xi YL; Gu J; Jiang S; Zhu H; Zhang BX
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol; 2017 Oct; 327(8):523-531. PubMed ID: 29356432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal Effects Via Resting eggs in Predator Defense of the Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus.
    Li X; Niu C
    Zoolog Sci; 2018 Feb; 35(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 29417899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.
    Hammill E; Beckerman AP
    Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 19936795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defence mitigation by predators of chemically defended prey integrated over the predation sequence and across biological levels with a focus on cardiotonic steroids.
    Mohammadi S; Yang L; Bulbert M; Rowland HM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Sep; 9(9):220363. PubMed ID: 36133149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey.
    Curley EA; Rowley HE; Speed MP
    Biol Lett; 2015 Jun; 11(6):20150152. PubMed ID: 26085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numbers, neighbors, and hungry predators: What makes chemically defended aposematic prey susceptible to predation?
    Kaczmarek JM; Kaczmarski M; Mazurkiewicz J; Kloskowski J
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(24):13705-13716. PubMed ID: 33391674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density-dependent effects of prey defences.
    Jeschke JM; Tollrian R
    Oecologia; 2000 May; 123(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 28308594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An escape theory model for directionally moving prey and an experimental test in juvenile Chinook salmon.
    Sabal MC; Merz JE; Alonzo SH; Palkovacs EP
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1824-1836. PubMed ID: 32267534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change in prey genotype frequency rescues predator from extinction.
    Hermann RJ; Becks L
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Jun; 9(6):220211. PubMed ID: 35754995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dormant plasticity of rotifer diapausing eggs in response to predator kairomones.
    Yin X; Zhao Y; Tian S; Li X
    Biol Lett; 2021 Nov; 17(11):20210422. PubMed ID: 34784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of predator-induced behavioural plasticity on the temperature dependence of predator-prey activity and population dynamics.
    Gvoždík L; Boukal DS
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Feb; 90(2):503-514. PubMed ID: 33159686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulating more realistic predation threat using attack playbacks.
    Watve M; Prati S; Taborsky B
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8149. PubMed ID: 31875146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence.
    Carthey AJ; Banks PB
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2014 Nov; 89(4):932-49. PubMed ID: 25319946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sheep in wolves' clothing: prey rely on proactive defences when predator and non-predator cues are similar.
    Symes LB; Martinson SJ; Kernan CE; Ter Hofstede HM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Aug; 287(1933):20201212. PubMed ID: 32842929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.
    Sherratt TN; Beatty CD
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do anuran larvae respond behaviourally to chemical cues from an invasive crayfish predator? A community-wide study.
    Nunes AL; Richter-Boix A; Laurila A; Rebelo R
    Oecologia; 2013 Jan; 171(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 22707039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.