These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Oppel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time. Rothwell B; Zaidel E Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 2304816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of unilateral brain lesions on perception of visual illusions. Grabowska A; Szymanska O; Nowicka A; Kwiecein M Behav Brain Res; 1992 Apr; 47(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 1590949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A stereo illusion induced by binocularly presented gratings: effects of number of eyes stimulated, spatial frequency, orientation, field size, and viewing distance. Odom JV; Chao GM Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 3627934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: a window technique for estimating path curvature. McBeath MK; Shepard RN Percept Psychophys; 1989 Oct; 46(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 2798026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measures of displacement and type of background in apparent motion with random-dot cinematograms. Lenel JC; Berbaum K Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(4):563-81. PubMed ID: 6517164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the adjacency between background cues and objects in visual localization during ocular pursuit. Mateeff S; Hohnsbein J Perception; 1989; 18(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 2771598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention. von Mühlenen A; Lleras A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 18085944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Meaningful' patterns in visual noise: effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP. Brugger P; Regard M; Landis T; Cook N; Krebs D; Niederberger J Psychopathology; 1993; 26(5-6):261-5. PubMed ID: 8190845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of apparent movement on mental rotation. Corballis MC; Blackman AR Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 2233268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemispheric differences for visual search: serial vs parallel processing revisited. Polich JM Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 7121797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion. Ramachandran VS; Inada V; Kiama G Vision Res; 1986; 26(10):1741-9. PubMed ID: 3617515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pattern orientation, not motion, determines the two-dimensional tilt illusion. Johnstone S; Wenderoth P Perception; 1989; 18(6):729-37. PubMed ID: 2628924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The perception of shrinking in apparent motion. Hershenson M Percept Psychophys; 1992 Dec; 52(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 1287571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral processing of numbers: parallel processing versus functional unity. Berger JM; Landolt M Cortex; 1990 Dec; 26(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 2081393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]