These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36010805)

  • 1. Contrarian Voter Model under the Influence of an Oscillating Propaganda: Consensus, Bimodal Behavior and Stochastic Resonance.
    Gimenez MC; Reinaudi L; Vazquez F
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Aug; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 36010805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fitness voter model: Damped oscillations and anomalous consensus.
    Woolcock A; Connaughton C; Merali Y; Vazquez F
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Sep; 96(3-1):032313. PubMed ID: 29346969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phase transition in a coevolving network of conformist and contrarian voters.
    Yi SD; Baek SK; Zhu CP; Kim BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jan; 87(1):012806. PubMed ID: 23410387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear q-voter model with inflexible zealots.
    Mobilia M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(1):012803. PubMed ID: 26274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voter models with contrarian agents.
    Masuda N
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Nov; 88(5):052803. PubMed ID: 24329314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear q-voter model.
    Castellano C; Muñoz MA; Pastor-Satorras R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Oct; 80(4 Pt 1):041129. PubMed ID: 19905295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetric coevolutionary voter dynamics.
    Wieland S; Nunes A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Dec; 88(6):062809. PubMed ID: 24483513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Threshold q-voter model.
    Vieira AR; Anteneodo C
    Phys Rev E; 2018 May; 97(5-1):052106. PubMed ID: 29906869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zealots in multistate noisy voter models.
    Khalil N; Galla T
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012311. PubMed ID: 33601527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation: A dynamic model.
    Gastner MT; Takács K; Gulyás M; Szvetelszky Z; Oborny B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218729. PubMed ID: 31242270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Zealots in the mean-field noisy voter model.
    Khalil N; San Miguel M; Toral R
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Jan; 97(1-1):012310. PubMed ID: 29448335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pair approximation for the noisy threshold q-voter model.
    Vieira AR; Peralta AF; Toral R; Miguel MS; Anteneodo C
    Phys Rev E; 2020 May; 101(5-1):052131. PubMed ID: 32575340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noisy multistate voter model for flocking in finite dimensions.
    Loscar ES; Baglietto G; Vazquez F
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Sep; 104(3-1):034111. PubMed ID: 34654099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interacting opinion and disease dynamics in multiplex networks: Discontinuous phase transition and nonmonotonic consensus times.
    Velásquez-Rojas F; Vazquez F
    Phys Rev E; 2017 May; 95(5-1):052315. PubMed ID: 28618582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opinion strength influences the spatial dynamics of opinion formation.
    Baumgaertner BO; Tyson RT; Krone SM
    J Math Sociol; 2016; 40(4):207-218. PubMed ID: 28529381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear voter model with contrarian agents.
    Tanabe S; Masuda N
    Chaos; 2013 Dec; 23(4):043136. PubMed ID: 24387575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitting in and breaking up: A nonlinear version of coevolving voter models.
    Kureh YH; Porter MA
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jun; 101(6-1):062303. PubMed ID: 32688568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Veritable Zoology of Successive Phase Transitions in the Asymmetric
    Chmiel A; Sienkiewicz J; Fronczak A; Fronczak P
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Sep; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 33286787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model.
    Klamser PP; Wiedermann M; Donges JF; Donner RV
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Nov; 96(5-1):052315. PubMed ID: 29347768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and stationary-state solutions of a three-dimensional random-field Ising model under a time-dependent periodic external field.
    Yüksel Y; Vatansever E; Akıncı U; Polat H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 May; 85(5 Pt 1):051123. PubMed ID: 23004719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.