These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36011340)

  • 1. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
    Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
    Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
    Coble MD; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.
    Huffman K; Kruijver M; Ballantyne J; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102908. PubMed ID: 37402330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. STRmix
    Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
    Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.