These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36011467)

  • 1. 3D Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Measured by DInSAR and MAI of the 2017 Sarpol Zahab Earthquake, Mw7.3.
    Ali R; Wu X; Chen Q; Elubid BA; Dafalla DS; Kamran M; Aldoud AA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Field of the Chi-Chi Earthquake Inferred from SAR Image Matching.
    Hu J; Li ZW; Ding XL; Zhu JJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2008 Oct; 8(10):6484-6495. PubMed ID: 27873882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-seismic deformation mechanism of the July 2015 MW 6.5 Pishan earthquake revealed by Sentinel-1A InSAR observation.
    Wang S; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Jiao J; Ji Z; Han M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18536. PubMed ID: 33116168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake.
    Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coseismic Deformation Field and Fault Slip Distribution Inversion of the 2020 Jiashi
    Zhang X; Li J; Liu X; Li Z; Adil N
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sentinel optical and SAR data highlights multi-segment faulting during the 2018 Palu-Sulawesi earthquake (M
    Bacques G; de Michele M; Foumelis M; Raucoules D; Lemoine A; Briole P
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9103. PubMed ID: 32499496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes.
    Gao Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jian H; Wu R; Yin W
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14188. PubMed ID: 34244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieving Precise Three-Dimensional Deformation on the 2014 M6.0 South Napa Earthquake by Joint Inversion of Multi-Sensor SAR.
    Jo MJ; Jung HS; Yun SH
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5485. PubMed ID: 28710455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. En échelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes.
    Yue H; Lay T; Koper KD
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):245-9. PubMed ID: 23023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model.
    Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SAR and Optical Data Comparison for Detecting Co-Seismic Slip and Induced Phenomena during the 2018 M
    Polcari M; Tolomei C; Bignami C; Stramondo S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 31540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast and slow intraplate ruptures during the 19 October 2020 magnitude 7.6 Shumagin earthquake.
    Bai Y; Liu C; Lay T; Cheung KF; Yamazaki Y
    Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2015. PubMed ID: 37037813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Buried shallow fault slip from the South Napa earthquake revealed by near-field geodesy.
    Brooks BA; Minson SE; Glennie CL; Nevitt JM; Dawson T; Rubin R; Ericksen TL; Lockner D; Hudnut K; Langenheim V; Lutz A; Mareschal M; Murray J; Schwartz D; Zaccone D
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jul; 3(7):e1700525. PubMed ID: 28782026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Crustal Dynamics and Its Geological Explanation of the Three-Dimensional Co-Seismic Deformation Field for the 2021 Maduo
    Li X; Chen Y; Wang X; Xiong R
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America.
    Lay T; Nishenko SP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Dec; 119(51):e2216843119. PubMed ID: 36512498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The source parameters, surface deformation and tectonic setting of three recent earthquakes: thessalonki (Greece), tabas-e-golshan (iran) and carlisle (u.k.).
    King G; Soufleris C; Berberian M
    Disasters; 1981 Mar; 5(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20958479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolving Fine-Scale Heterogeneity of Co-seismic Slip and the Relation to Fault Structure.
    Milliner CW; Sammis C; Allam AA; Dolan JF; Hollingsworth J; Leprince S; Ayoub F
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27201. PubMed ID: 27256901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Widespread ground motion distribution caused by rupture directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake.
    Koketsu K; Miyake H; Guo Y; Kobayashi H; Masuda T; Davuluri S; Bhattarai M; Adhikari LB; Sapkota SN
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28536. PubMed ID: 27335317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plate-boundary deformation associated with the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake.
    Subarya C; Chlieh M; Prawirodirdjo L; Avouac JP; Bock Y; Sieh K; Meltzner AJ; Natawidjaja DH; McCaffrey R
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):46-51. PubMed ID: 16511486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.