These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36011805)
41. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment. Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Orthognathic surgery complications: The 10-year experience of a single center. Peleg O; Mahmoud R; Shuster A; Arbel S; Manor Y; Ianculovici C; Kleinman S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 49(10):891-897. PubMed ID: 33994296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact on the pharyngeal airway space of different orthognathic procedures for the prognathic mandible. Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Magaleh SM; Iskandar RA; Al-Hendi EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1110-8. PubMed ID: 26025815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Does the Levasseur-Merrill Retractor Provide Reliable In Vivo Guidance for the Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy? Loh LHJ; Sesanto RL; Catlin KA; Oster RA; Louis PJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 80(11):1740-1746. PubMed ID: 36076359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite. Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method. Takazakura D; Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Shamiul A; Yamamoto E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17141470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse. Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback surgery in monkeys: intraoral vertical versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Zhao Q; Hu J; Wang D; Zhu S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17428700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise. Ohba S; Tasaki H; Tobita T; Minamizato T; Kawasaki T; Motooka N; Watanabe E; Yoshida N; Asahina I J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Versatility of Extraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Prognathism: A Prospective Study. Krishnamurthy S; Balasubramaniam S; Rajenthiran A; Thirunavukkarasu R Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32673. PubMed ID: 36660517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Transverse and sagittal angulations of proximal segment after sagittal split and vertical ramus osteotomies and their influence on the stability of distal segment. Pan JH; Lee JJ; Lin HY; Chen YJ; Jane Yao CC; Kok SH J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 May; 112(5):244-52. PubMed ID: 23660219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Simple Technique for Reducing the Buccal Fat Pad During Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery. Kawase-Koga Y; Shibata K; Kimoto A; Watanabe M; Chikazu D J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):e404-e405. PubMed ID: 29489573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. Choung PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Direction of Double-Jaw Surgery Relapse for Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity: Bilateral Sagittal Split Versus Intraoral Vertical Ramus Setback Osteotomies. Al-Delayme RMA; Alsagban AAR; Ahmed FT; Farag A; Al-Allaq T; Virdee P; Alnajjar Z; Alsamaraie SAI; Elnashef S; Arab L; Yassin A; Al-Khen M J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Jun; 18(2):280-287. PubMed ID: 30996552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies. Al-Delayme RM; Al-Khen M J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Dec; 13(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26225013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Rotation tendency of the posteriorly displaced proximal segment after vertical ramus osteotomy. Park JC; Lee J; Lim HJ; Kim BC J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2096-2102. PubMed ID: 30318326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Intraoperative Hemorrhage and Postoperative Sequelae after Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy to Treat Mandibular Prognathism. Chen CM; Lai S; Chen KK; Lee HE Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():318270. PubMed ID: 26543855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]