BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36012445)

  • 1. Increased Gene Targeting in Hyper-Recombinogenic LymphoBlastoid Cell Lines Leaves Unchanged DSB Processing by Homologous Recombination.
    Mladenov E; Paul-Konietzko K; Mladenova V; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Aug; 23(16):. PubMed ID: 36012445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of chromatid-break-repair detects a homologous recombination to non-homologous end-joining switch with increasing load of DNA double-strand breaks.
    Murmann-Konda T; Soni A; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2021 Jul; 867():503372. PubMed ID: 34266628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disruption of Chromatin Dynamics by Hypotonic Stress Suppresses HR and Shifts DSB Processing to Error-Prone SSA.
    Krieger LM; Mladenov E; Soni A; Demond M; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 34681628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Facets of DNA Double Strand Break Repair: Radiation Dose as Key Determinant of HR versus c-NHEJ Engagement.
    Mladenov E; Mladenova V; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Oct; 24(19):. PubMed ID: 37834403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromosome breaks generated by low doses of ionizing radiation in G
    Soni A; Murmann-Konda T; Siemann-Loekes M; Pantelias GE; Iliakis G
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2020 May; 89():102828. PubMed ID: 32143127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PTEN Loss Enhances Error-Prone DSB Processing and Tumor Cell Radiosensitivity by Suppressing RAD51 Expression and Homologous Recombination.
    Pei X; Mladenov E; Soni A; Li F; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 36361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficiency of homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining systems in repairing double-strand breaks during cell cycle progression.
    Bee L; Fabris S; Cherubini R; Mognato M; Celotti L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69061. PubMed ID: 23874869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in double-strand break repair-facts and myths.
    Takeda S; Hoa NN; Sasanuma H
    J Radiat Res; 2016 Aug; 57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i25-i32. PubMed ID: 27311583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rad51 recruitment and exclusion of non-homologous end joining during homologous recombination at a Tus/Ter mammalian replication fork barrier.
    Willis NA; Panday A; Duffey EE; Scully R
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1007486. PubMed ID: 30024881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of nonhomologous DNA end joining, conservative homologous recombination, and single-strand annealing in the cell cycle-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by H(2)O(2) in mammalian cells.
    Frankenberg-Schwager M; Becker M; Garg I; Pralle E; Wolf H; Frankenberg D
    Radiat Res; 2008 Dec; 170(6):784-93. PubMed ID: 19138034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-pathway DNA-repair reporters reveal competition between end-joining, single-strand annealing and homologous recombination at Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks.
    van de Kooij B; Kruswick A; van Attikum H; Yaffe MB
    Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5295. PubMed ID: 36075911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Akt1 Stimulates Homologous Recombination Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in a Rad51-Dependent Manner.
    Mueck K; Rebholz S; Harati MD; Rodemann HP; Toulany M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 29156644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks: A Review of Surrogate Plasmid-Based Reporter Methods.
    Dutta A; Mitra J; Hegde PM; Mitra S; Hegde ML
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2701():173-182. PubMed ID: 37574482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The complexity of DNA double strand breaks is a critical factor enhancing end-resection.
    Yajima H; Fujisawa H; Nakajima NI; Hirakawa H; Jeggo PA; Okayasu R; Fujimori A
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2013 Nov; 12(11):936-46. PubMed ID: 24041488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative end-joining repair pathways are the ultimate backup for abrogated classical non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair: Implications for the formation of chromosome translocations.
    Iliakis G; Murmann T; Soni A
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Nov; 793():166-75. PubMed ID: 26520387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double-strand break repair assays determine pathway choice and structure of gene conversion events in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Do AT; Brooks JT; Le Neveu MK; LaRocque JR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Mar; 4(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 24368780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strong suppression of gene conversion with increasing DNA double-strand break load delimited by 53BP1 and RAD52.
    Mladenov E; Staudt C; Soni A; Murmann-Konda T; Siemann-Loekes M; Iliakis G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Feb; 48(4):1905-1924. PubMed ID: 31832684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deregulation of DNA double-strand break repair in multiple myeloma: implications for genome stability.
    Herrero AB; San Miguel J; Gutierrez NC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121581. PubMed ID: 25790254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rad18 and Rnf8 facilitate homologous recombination by two distinct mechanisms, promoting Rad51 focus formation and suppressing the toxic effect of nonhomologous end joining.
    Kobayashi S; Kasaishi Y; Nakada S; Takagi T; Era S; Motegi A; Chiu RK; Takeda S; Hirota K
    Oncogene; 2015 Aug; 34(33):4403-11. PubMed ID: 25417706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The high toxicity of DSB-clusters modelling high-LET-DNA damage derives from inhibition of c-NHEJ and promotion of alt-EJ and SSA despite increases in HR.
    Mladenova V; Mladenov E; Chaudhary S; Stuschke M; Iliakis G
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2022; 10():1016951. PubMed ID: 36263011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.