175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36014259)
41. Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods.
Ward K; Fan ZH
J Micromech Microeng; 2015 Sep; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 26549938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A numerical and experimental study of acoustic micromixing in 3D microchannels for lab-on-a-chip devices.
Catarino SO; Pinto VC; Sousa PJ; Lima R; Miranda JM; Minas G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5660-5663. PubMed ID: 28269539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Frequency spectrum of the noise emitted by two interacting cavitation bubbles in strong acoustic fields.
Jiang L; Liu F; Chen H; Wang J; Chen D
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Mar; 85(3 Pt 2):036312. PubMed ID: 22587185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Chemical History of a Bubble.
Suslick KS; Eddingsaas NC; Flannigan DJ; Hopkins SD; Xu H
Acc Chem Res; 2018 Sep; 51(9):2169-2178. PubMed ID: 29771111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of surface tension on the dynamics of a single micro bubble near a rigid wall in an ultrasonic field.
Wu H; Zheng H; Li Y; Ohl CD; Yu H; Li D
Ultrason Sonochem; 2021 Oct; 78():105735. PubMed ID: 34479075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The importance of travelling wave components in standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) systems.
Devendran C; Albrecht T; Brenker J; Alan T; Neild A
Lab Chip; 2016 Sep; 16(19):3756-3766. PubMed ID: 27722363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A millisecond micromixer via single-bubble-based acoustic streaming.
Ahmed D; Mao X; Shi J; Juluri BK; Huang TJ
Lab Chip; 2009 Sep; 9(18):2738-41. PubMed ID: 19704991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Enhancement of oscillation amplitude of cavitation bubble due to acoustic wake effect in multibubble environment.
Yamamoto T; Komarov SV
Ultrason Sonochem; 2021 Oct; 78():105734. PubMed ID: 34469851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Chaotic micromixing in open wells using audio-frequency acoustic microstreaming.
Petkovic-Duran K; Manasseh R; Zhu Y; Ooi A
Biotechniques; 2009 Oct; 47(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 19852766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Influences of non-uniform pressure field outside bubbles on the propagation of acoustic waves in dilute bubbly liquids.
Zhang Y; Du X
Ultrason Sonochem; 2015 Sep; 26():119-127. PubMed ID: 25771332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A Pumpless Acoustofluidic Platform for Size-Selective Concentration and Separation of Microparticles.
Ahmed H; Destgeer G; Park J; Jung JH; Ahmad R; Park K; Sung HJ
Anal Chem; 2017 Dec; 89(24):13575-13581. PubMed ID: 29156880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ultrafast microfluidics using surface acoustic waves.
Yeo LY; Friend JR
Biomicrofluidics; 2009 Jan; 3(1):12002. PubMed ID: 19693383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impedance matched channel walls in acoustofluidic systems.
Leibacher I; Schatzer S; Dual J
Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A Simulated Investigation of Lithium Niobate Orientation Effects on Standing Acoustic Waves.
Janardhana RD; Jackson N
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 37837145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 3D measurement and simulation of surface acoustic wave driven fluid motion: a comparison.
Kiebert F; Wege S; Massing J; König J; Cierpka C; Weser R; Schmidt H
Lab Chip; 2017 Jun; 17(12):2104-2114. PubMed ID: 28540945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Continuous flow actuation between external reservoirs in small-scale devices driven by surface acoustic waves.
Dentry MB; Friend JR; Yeo LY
Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(4):750-8. PubMed ID: 24336764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Optimization Analysis of Particle Separation Parameters for a Standing Surface Acoustic Wave Acoustofluidic Chip.
Han J; Hu H; Lei Y; Huang Q; Fu C; Gai C; Ning J
ACS Omega; 2023 Jan; 8(1):311-323. PubMed ID: 36643460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Theory of acoustophoresis in counterpropagating surface acoustic wave fields for particle separation.
Liu Z; Xu G; Ni Z; Chen X; Guo X; Tu J; Zhang D
Phys Rev E; 2021 Mar; 103(3-1):033104. PubMed ID: 33862812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improving electrokinetic microdevice stability by controlling electrolysis bubbles.
Lee HY; Barber C; Minerick AR
Electrophoresis; 2014 Jul; 35(12-13):1782-9. PubMed ID: 24648277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Characterization of acoustic droplet vaporization for control of bubble generation under flow conditions.
Kang ST; Huang YL; Yeh CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 24433748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
