These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36015798)

  • 1. Development of a Framework for Generating Driving Safety Assessment Scenarios for Automated Vehicles.
    Ko W; Park S; Yun J; Park S; Yun I
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of freeway-based test scenarios for applying new car assessment program to automated vehicles.
    Ko W; Park S; Park S; Jeong H; Yun I
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271532. PubMed ID: 35862304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety evaluation method in multi-logical scenarios for automated vehicles based on naturalistic driving trajectory.
    Zhang P; Zhu B; Zhao J; Fan T; Sun Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106926. PubMed ID: 36543079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?
    Zhou R; Zhang G; Huang H; Wei Z; Zhou H; Jin J; Chang F; Chen J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107572. PubMed ID: 38657314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and classification of autonomous vehicle's ambiguous driving scenario.
    Baby T; Ippoliti HŞ; Wintersberger P; Zhang Y; Yoon SH; Lee J; Lee SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107501. PubMed ID: 38471236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles, the Sensors and Measurement Systems Used in Experiments.
    Prochowski L; Szwajkowski P; Ziubiński M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How certain are we that our automated driving system is safe?
    de Gelder E; Op den Camp O
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S131-S140. PubMed ID: 37267005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review on Functional Testing Scenario Library Generation for Connected and Automated Vehicles.
    Zhu Y; Wang J; Meng F; Liu T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for definition of logical scenarios for safety assurance of automated driving.
    Weber H; Bock J; Klimke J; Roesener C; Hiller J; Krajewski R; Zlocki A; Eckstein L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S65-S70. PubMed ID: 31381437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver models for the definition of safety requirements of automated vehicles in international regulations. Application to motorway driving conditions.
    Mattas K; Albano G; Donà R; Galassi MC; Suarez-Bertoa R; Vass S; Ciuffo B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106743. PubMed ID: 35700684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.
    Moradloo N; Mahdinia I; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107607. PubMed ID: 38723333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Song H; Liu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.
    Guo Y; Liu Y; Wang B; Huang P; Xu H; Bai Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107610. PubMed ID: 38749269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical voxel learning with vision transformer and derivation of logical AV safety assessment scenarios.
    Kang M; Seo J; Hwang K; Yoon Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107422. PubMed ID: 38064940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The typical AV accident scenarios in the urban area obtained by clustering and association rule mining of real-world accident reports.
    Lee H; Kang M; Hwang K; Yoon Y
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25000. PubMed ID: 38317967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P; Ni H; Wang L; Yu G; Sun J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess public receptivity toward autonomous vehicles and its relation with the traffic safety climate in China.
    Qu W; Xu J; Ge Y; Sun X; Zhang K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():78-86. PubMed ID: 30986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.