126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36015925)
1. On the Problem of State Recognition in Injection Molding Based on Accelerometer Data Sets.
Brunthaler J; Grabski P; Sturm V; Lubowski W; Efrosinin D
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data.
Dixon PC; Schütte KH; Vanwanseele B; Jacobs JV; Dennerlein JT; Schiffman JM; Fournier PA; Hu B
Gait Posture; 2019 Oct; 74():176-181. PubMed ID: 31539798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analyzing the Effectiveness and Contribution of Each Axis of Tri-Axial Accelerometer Sensor for Accurate Activity Recognition.
Javed AR; Sarwar MU; Khan S; Iwendi C; Mittal M; Kumar N
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32295298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single Accelerometer to Recognize Human Activities Using Neural Networks.
Vakacherla SS; Kantharaju P; Mevada M; Kim M
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Jun; 145(6):. PubMed ID: 36695756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine Learning on Prediction of Relative Physical Activity Intensity Using Medical Radar Sensor and 3D Accelerometer.
Biró A; Szilágyi SM; Szilágyi L; Martín-Martín J; Cuesta-Vargas AI
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of activity type in preschool children using machine learning techniques.
Hagenbuchner M; Cliff DP; Trost SG; Van Tuc N; Peoples GE
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jul; 18(4):426-31. PubMed ID: 25088983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detecting Food Intake.
Ghosh T; Sazonov E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():2993-2996. PubMed ID: 36085821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic machine-learning based identification of jogging periods from accelerometer measurements of adolescents under field conditions.
Zdravevski E; Risteska Stojkoska B; Standl M; Schulz H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184216. PubMed ID: 28880923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine Learning in Injection Molding: An Industry 4.0 Method of Quality Prediction.
Párizs RD; Török D; Ageyeva T; Kovács JG
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of Raw Accelerometer Data and Machine-Learning Techniques to Characterize Human Movement Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Narayanan A; Desai F; Stewart T; Duncan S; Mackay L
J Phys Act Health; 2020 Mar; 17(3):360-383. PubMed ID: 32035416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smartphone Motion Sensor-Based Complex Human Activity Identification Using Deep Stacked Autoencoder Algorithm for Enhanced Smart Healthcare System.
Alo UR; Nweke HF; Teh YW; Murtaza G
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33167424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolutionary Design of Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Activity Recognition in Sensor-Rich Environments.
Baldominos A; Saez Y; Isasi P
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29690587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of pulmonary nodules based on a multiscale feature 3D U-Net convolutional neural network of transfer learning.
Tang S; Yang M; Bai J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235672. PubMed ID: 32845877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning for evolutive lymphoma and residual masses recognition in whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images.
Ferjaoui R; Cherni MA; Boujnah S; Kraiem NEH; Kraiem T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 209():106320. PubMed ID: 34390938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data.
Gomes E; Bertini L; Campos WR; Sobral AP; Mocaiber I; Copetti A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33572249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfer Learning Improves Accelerometer-Based Child Activity Recognition via Subject-Independent Adult-Domain Adaption.
Li J; Kang P; Tan T; B Shull P
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 May; 26(5):2086-2095. PubMed ID: 34623286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Texture Recognition Based on Perception Data from a Bionic Tactile Sensor.
Huang S; Wu H
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study.
Chae SH; Kim Y; Lee KS; Park HS
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17216. PubMed ID: 32480361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
