These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3601616)

  • 1. Geophysical variables and behavior: XXXIX. Alterations in imaginings and suggestibility during brief magnetic field exposures.
    De Sano CF; Persinger MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Jun; 64(3 Pt 1):968-70. PubMed ID: 3601616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geophysical variables and behavior: XXV. Alterations in memory for a narrative following application of theta frequency electromagnetic fields.
    Michaud LY; Persinger MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):416-8. PubMed ID: 4000856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does phase-modulation of applied 40-Hz transcerebral magnetic fields affect subjective experiences and hypnotic induction?
    Sculthorpe L; Persinger MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Dec; 97(3 Pt 2):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15002842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced hypnotic suggestibility following application of burst-firing magnetic fields over the right temporoparietal lobes: a replication.
    Healey F; Persinger MA; Koren SA
    Int J Neurosci; 1996 Nov; 87(3-4):201-7. PubMed ID: 9003980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: an empirical analysis.
    Braffman W; Kirsch I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Sep; 77(3):578-87. PubMed ID: 10510510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suggestibility and negative priming: two replication studies.
    David D; Brown RJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jul; 50(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 12088330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to hypnotic and nonhypnotic suggestions: performance standards, imaginative suggestibility, and response expectancies.
    Meyer EC; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jul; 59(3):327-49. PubMed ID: 21644124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sleep EEG alterations: effects of pulsed magnetic fields versus pulse-modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fields.
    Schmid MR; Murbach M; Lustenberger C; Maire M; Kuster N; Achermann P; Loughran SP
    J Sleep Res; 2012 Dec; 21(6):620-9. PubMed ID: 22724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The predictive utility of hypnotizability: the change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis.
    Milling LS; Coursen EL; Shores JS; Waszkiewicz JA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2010 Feb; 78(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20099958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involvement in suggestion-related imaginings, experienced involuntariness, and credibility assigned to imaginings in hypnotic subjects.
    Spanos NP; McPeake JD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1974 Dec; 83(6):687-90. PubMed ID: 4448871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypnotic suggestibility predicts the magnitude of the imaginative word blindness suggestion effect in a non-hypnotic context.
    Parris BA; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 23778018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hypnogenic action of a modulated electromagnetic field].
    Sudakov KV; Antimoniĭ GD
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1977 Aug; 84(8):146-9. PubMed ID: 561631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Involvement in suggestion-related imaginings and the "hypnotic dream".
    Spanos N; Ham MW
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1975 Jul; 18(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 1163462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. THE DEFINITION OF THE SITUATION AS A VARIABLE AFFECTING "HYPNOTIC-LIKE" SUGGESTIBILITY.
    BARBER TX; CALVERLEY DS
    J Clin Psychol; 1964 Oct; 20():438-40. PubMed ID: 14228545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between imaginative ability variables and the Barber Suggestibility Scale.
    Spanos NP; McPeake JD; Churchill N
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1976 Jul; 19(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 937215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Red light facilitates the sensed presence elicited by application of weak, burst-firing magnetic fields over the temporal lobes.
    Meli SC; Persinger MA
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 19116832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects on suggestibility of experimenter prestige under hypnotic induction, task motivated, and waking imagination conditions.
    Matheus JM
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1973 Jan; 15(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 4780120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary process, hypnotic dreams, and the hidden observer: hypnosis versus alert imagining.
    Pinnell CM; Lynn SJ; Pinnell JP
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 9780526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter.
    Deadman JE; Camus M; Armstrong BG; Héroux P; Cyr D; Plante M; Thériault G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Aug; 49(8):409-19. PubMed ID: 3177219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suggestibility, and vividness and control of imagery.
    Spanos NP; Valois R; Ham MW; Ham ML
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1973 Oct; 21(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 4746260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.